There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with ! |
Soundness
Part of the series on Logic and rhetoric |
Key articles |
General logic |
Bad logic |
In deductive logic, soundness is a property of arguments importantly related to validity. An argument is valid if and only if it is impossible for the conclusion to be false while the premises are true (i.e. the conclusion must follow from the premises), but an argument is sound if and only if it is valid and its premises are actually true.
Note that an argument can be valid without being sound. Take for example:
- P1: If someone knows and employs logic and scientific reasoning, then they do not propagate woo
- P2: Deepak Chopra knows and employs logic and scientific reasoning.
- C1: Therefore, he does not propagate woo.
The inference from P1 and P2 to C1 is valid (affirming the antecedent) and thus the argument is valid. However, because P2 is false, the argument is not sound.