Talk:Atomwaffen Division

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon nazi.svg

This Nazism related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Steelbrain.png
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Alt-right?[edit]

But seriously, can anyone with a straight face actually say that these guys are alt-right? I do see a lot of the right in there alright, but very little of the alt- part, at least when compared to the groups the moniker is usually applied to. I think the Nazi template and category are much more apt. --85.76.41.251 (talk) 14:32, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Given the fact that the Alt-right is repackaged Nazism, I don't see the difference. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 14:42, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Well alt-right groups and individuals usually at least try to hide behind a veneer of some other description of themselves beside neo-Nazis – even our glossary refers to this (humorously, yes, but still). Here however we have a group who advertise themselves by urging people to "join their local Nazis", no sugarcoating whatsoever. --85.76.106.71 (talk) 14:06, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
There is no difference. It's one of the few things that Nazis and anti-Nazis agree on:
Well, tough luck, fags. The alt-right is just a euphemism for Nazism.
The Daily Stormer, actual Nazi website[1]
By all means, compare these shitheads to the Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you.
—Mike Godwin of Godwin's Law fame, referring to the Unite the Right rally[2]
Bongolian (talk) 19:15, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
True for the most part. The difference is in the presentation and not in the substance. --2001:999:41:E82A:1091:FF2B:198B:6224 (talk) 20:11, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Should we link to an interview with an O9A member?[edit]

I found an hour long interview with one of the O9A fuckers, but I'm not sure if we should link to it. Should we? Carthage (talk) 17:47, 20 December 2023 (UTC)