There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Barack Obama/Archive6
Evil Obama Is Evil[edit]
I do like this image. Lyra § talk 06:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Opening section[edit]
It sucks. Just bringing it to your attention. 24.13.203.96 (talk) 02:17, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Why? ħuman
04:23, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Because it's the most mashed-up and mangled piece of writing on the entire site. It wouldn't even cut the mustard for Uncyclopedia.
sshole 23:36, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- Because it's the most mashed-up and mangled piece of writing on the entire site. It wouldn't even cut the mustard for Uncyclopedia.
Barack Obama[edit]
At the Gridiron Club had the band play 'Born in the USA.' (From an article in a newspaper). 212.85.6.26 (talk) 16:36, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
FTR[edit]
I rewrote this page without the jokes-on-top-of-jokes-on-top-of-jokes thing you've got going in this version. It also has some actual facts that aren't here ('cabinet appointments' just says 'and some other people', which is... uh... super), and generally doesn't look stupid. Any chance I can delete this one and replace it with mine? Mei III (talk) 02:51, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- I have no objections. ТyTalk. 02:53, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Needs moar ACORN and New Black Panther Party. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 02:57, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- The changes look fine to me. We do have a template for linking to "the main article" in a section.
ListenerXTalkerX 03:05, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Needs moar ACORN and New Black Panther Party. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 02:57, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
FISA[edit]
So he voted against the 2007 Protect America Bill [4] but said he supported FISA legislation[5], though I can't figure out what bill this refers to to see how he voted. Do we want to relook at our FISA sentence, our is his vocal support enough? ThunderkatzHo! 15:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- There's more to the matter than just a vote on one bill. This, for instance. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 15:42, 8 April 2011 (UTC)