There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
http://www.ibtimes.com/what-cryptojacking-trend-continues-grow-2612969 —♥Hamburguesa con queso con un cara♥ (talk • stalk) 02:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Expanding on the content of this article.
This is not really a critique of the contents of the Bitcoin article, but a suggestion for *additional* content. Namely, I would find a section going into more detail about the scams in the crypto space very informative (and entertaining) to read. Off the top off my head:
- Ponzi schemes (Like bitconnect)
- The shady behavior of exchanges
- On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: on the toolbar above the edit panel. You can also indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line. Thank you. I think it would be best to have a separate cryptocurrency article. You are right that there a lot more things that could be addressed. To be honest, I don't think Bitcoin needs its own article at all, since there's nothing that distinctly separates it from other cryptocurrencies. Feel free to draft something up in your sandbox. —Kazitor, pending 10:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Warren Buffet: BTC is "probably rat poison squared"
...aaand it's gone.
The one exception to Betteridge's Law of Headlines
https://phys.org/news/2018-07-bitcoin-network-oligarchy.html 126.96.36.199 (talk) 02:37, 4 July 2018 (UTC)