Talk:Cathy Brennan

This article contains information about one or more living persons. Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats. Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed. If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

	This Gender related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Archives for this talk page:

<1>

, (new)

Different quote

Is there a different quote we can use for the top of the page? ^{— Unsigned, by: 86.145.6.108 / talk / contribs}

Why? - David Gerard (talk) 10:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

WHAT......THE.......FUCK?!

Cathy needs to get a life if she has nothing better to do than degrade Transgender people.--Rationalzombie94 (talk) 03:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Article Style

The personalised and vindictive tone of this article is out of place in a rational wiki. I realise it's a controversial area of public/social debate, and I'm not an admirer of Ms Brennan's work myself, but the article would fit better on Encyc Dramatica. It's very biased and attacking, reflects poorly upon RW's credibility. (Unregistered casual editor, long-term fan of RW). 27 Aug 2018. Thanks

Honestly, I think we're being too kind by giving Cathy this much credit. Especially in light of the atrocities she has committed against trans women and those who support us. --Verobell (talk) 16:50, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Pronouns?

Is there a reason the article uses "they" pronouns now? It seems like they were added suddenly by an editor without any source on why, the edit just said it was "more suitable." From Google I can't find a source on Brennan using pronouns other than "she," and it seems unlikely given Brennan's transphobia. 66.68.133.253 (talk) 07:50, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

I assume it's a joke? Whether it's funny is another question. --Annanoon (talk) 09:00, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Bump but I think the pronouns need to be changed back. It's not funny and it made me confused. --It's-a me, 🎄LeftyGreenMario!🎄 22:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Took over a year but it’s fixed. Christopher (talk) 22:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. --It's-a me, 🎄LeftyGreenMario!🎄 22:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

"Rational" wiki (drink!)

'Rational Wiki' suggests entries will be rational and objective - cool analysis and clear evidence free from a priori bias and personal invective. Whatever one's views on the issues, this belligerent piece brings the foundation into disrepute. ^{— Unsigned, by: 150.143.174.19 / talk}

Points out that any reasoned analysis that accounts for biology comes to the conclusion that you're an idiot who never got past the primers on chromosomes... ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 00:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Dead Link(s)

At least one of the reference links is dead: http://bugbrennan.tumblr.com/post/25219500003/so-are-you-saying-that-gay-people-didnt-exist-in-the Wayback machine didn't catch it. ^{— Unsigned, by: 67.183.34.121 / talk / contribs}

I don't even think this lady is transphobic anymore, she's not big into anti-trans activism now at least. Not surprised if she deleted her old blogs. Chillpilled (talk) 19:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)