There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Jonanism
The converse is 'I am not biased. I hate everybody equally.' 82.44.143.26 (talk) 15:44, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Delete[edit]
It appears to be in use around the interwebs. I'd say keep. Blue (is useful) 20:00, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- It's also funny. Тайговорить 20:04, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- If its funny, why not send to funspace? Or maybe merge into Jonah Goldberg article? I don't see any evidence this has any serious use other than as a criticism of Jonah Goldberg. And, maybe due to not being an American, I don't think I'd ever heard of Jonah Goldberg before this article; I might have possibly read some of his output at NRO once, but I don't read NRO enough to have noticed who its editor-in-chief is... (((Zack Martin)))™ 22:24, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Better name?[edit]
Really.--ZooGuard (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Really really. There is an actual fallacy here, and this is not a good name for it - David Gerard (talk) 17:42, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Review examples[edit]
It appears to me as if not all the examples listed match up very well to the three point definition so I'll see if I have the time to review them. ScepticWombat (talk) 08:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, and even the ones that do NEED sources. I prefer a few spot-on examples to us hosting an off-topic rumor mill thar's liable to get us sued. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 12:11, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Peter Boghossian irony[edit]
It's ironic that a quote by Boghossian should be at the top of this article, when one considers his recent and not-so-recent actions, including his demonisation of the field of Gender Studies, the so-called Left, and Postmodernism.132.185.160.126 (talk) 11:25, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
"Offenders" on the Left[edit]
> Wingnuts usually call nearly anybody who disagrees with them as "liberal" or "leftist", and far-left activists may call anyone who argues with them "bourgeois", "racist", or something similar.
Being a part of this community, I would say that "bourgeois" sounds really old-fashioned. Nowadays, dissenters within the left are more likely to be dismissed as "liberals" or "neoliberals." --XopherH (talk) 06:01, 26 March 2018 (UTC)