Talk:Kevin Martin

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Icon internet.svg

This Internet related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.


Archives for this talk page: , (new)

Lawsuit Goodness Added![edit]

I added some goodness, linking to the stupid lawsuit he filed against the government. — Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs

Full protection for a while[edit]

User:John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt just revdeleted some stuff on both the article and talk pages, and fully protected the article. This is a sensible thing to have done, and thank you JJJS - David Gerard (talk) 22:30, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Cue cries of censorship in 3... 2... 1... (talk) 22:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
A probably stupid thought: Should we put up an Template:Editnotice for articles that've been legally iffy before, to remind users that what they say needs solid proof? FuzzyCatTomato (talk/stalk) 00:32, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
But... but... those poor poor edit summaries! Censorshipz!!!one1! PacWalker 03:24, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Legal threats against Adblock users[edit]

Now he's sending Adblock users to shady malvertisers and posting on the Adblock Plus forums about taking the developers of ad-blocking software to court: Julyo (talk) 15:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Not the first to float such ideas, but that isn't the best-reasoned version I've ever seen... PacWalker 15:55, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
"Our team is already making a program to give the user a virus if they enter with an adblocker." Eyebrow.gif WėąṣėḷőįďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 17:40, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
So that's where that forum was! I was wondering where I found that.TGW me myself, and I 20:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
I've had a Mike Adams lackey tell me that using AdBlock is breaking the law because if I don't give Mike Adams money when I go to his website, I'm literally stealing his content. People seem to get really mad if they start getting less ad money from their bullshit. Frederick♠♣♥♦ 04:49, 12 April 2015 (UTC)


And I know y'know... His "people with autism focus on one subject" thing is not true. Narky SawtoothNarky.png (Floof!~) 02:57, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Thenfixit? Cømrade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 03:29, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Hm. I never saw that there was a response to this. Anyways, I was talking about him, not the article. Narky SawtoothNarky.png (Floof!~) 21:23, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Dead websites - maybe remove?[edit]

So I tried looking at the websites listed at the start of the article:

  • - is now some Russian site.
  • - seems to want to install a virus.
  • - No longer exists. --Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 15:44, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
If there any actual live links to those sites (rather than archived copies) they should be removed. But just listing the names of the sites he's operated should be fine. Leuders (talk) 15:56, 5 May 2017 (UTC)