Expose on Malcolm Kendrick
GOOD expose on Malcolm Kendrick, Zoë Harcombe and other statin deniers currently going around on the mainstream news in the UK. I have been saying this all along, the statin deniers are wrong.
- I've seen at least one other citation for Daily Mail on RationalWiki for a factual source. They're a stopped clock tabloid. Bongolian (talk) 23:50, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Why the lack of balance?
This is a pseudo-scientific hit piece. If you want to know Malcolm Kendrick's scientific views on cholesterol and statins, he has outlined them here in his response to the Daily Mail's disinfo attack: https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2019/03/03/cholesterol-games/ — Unsigned, by: Benjamindavidsteele / talk / contribs 17:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Probably because we, like the vast (VAST) majority of scientists, don't believe him. Scream!! (talk) 17:22, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- In that case, cite the scientific survey that proves your claim that "the vast (VAST) majority of scientists" who are informed experts in the field have never questioned or doubted the overprescription of statins that, in the research, has shown no decreased overall mortality. Otherwise, admit you're wrong, retract your position, and present an honest editing of this article. Whatever this article is, it isn't skepticism. So, what or rather whose purpose does it serve? Why not present all the available scientific evidence and all sides of the scientific debate, from The Lancet to the BMJ? That would be the scientific response to a disagreement among scientists. — Unsigned, by: Benjamindavidsteele / talk / contribs