|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
Talk:Pro-Family Resource Center
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wording of lede[edit]
What is "anti-homosexual bias"? Does this mean you support discrimination in housing against homosexuals?
Or is this a badly worded way to say "Opposition to homosexuality"? --Uncle Ed bug me 19:31, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- anti homosexual bias. - intentionally focusing on gays, trying to prove they are bad, evil, wrong, strange, sinners, trying to recruit our kids, trying to make us all gay, or just, you know, 'unhappy'. The desire to bash gays. The desire to make gays go away. The desire to keep things like marraige a Special Right for straights, just cause gays are icky and bad.
En attendant Godot 19:51, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
“”Bias. 2. A particular tendency or inclination, especially one that prevents unprejudiced consideration of a question; prejudice.
|
- Yep, that describes them all right. OK, so we like to listen to all views but those who spout such viscous nonsense as this bunch deserve no respect. I rate them as bad as stormfront. Bob Soles (talk) 14:46, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Ed dear. can you read? your own link shows that bias is not just position or activism. it is the inablity to form logical conclusions based on your feelings. "one that prevents unprejudiced consideration of a question". lordy.En attendant Godot 14:52, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Ed's not biased against homosexuals, so sir. Occasionaluse (talk) 14:57, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- prol'y not. He's an upstanding Christian who is just telling those "types" of "sinners" that he loves them, but hates the sin. So he thinks US law should respect his right to "hate the sin", and not their right to fucking love the person they want to love. Again, who the hell does it harm, but the couple in love????En attendant Godot 15:05, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- On a site that comes out with
- prol'y not. He's an upstanding Christian who is just telling those "types" of "sinners" that he loves them, but hates the sin. So he thinks US law should respect his right to "hate the sin", and not their right to fucking love the person they want to love. Again, who the hell does it harm, but the couple in love????
- Ed's not biased against homosexuals, so sir. Occasionaluse (talk) 14:57, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Ed dear. can you read? your own link shows that bias is not just position or activism. it is the inablity to form logical conclusions based on your feelings. "one that prevents unprejudiced consideration of a question". lordy.
- Yep, that describes them all right. OK, so we like to listen to all views but those who spout such viscous nonsense as this bunch deserve no respect. I rate them as bad as stormfront. Bob Soles (talk) 14:46, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
“”When the “right” to spread sexual disease and dysfunction supersedes the right to discourage such things in the courtrooms and legislatures of the world’s ruling powers their end is likely near.
|
- This is directly saying that teh gays spread sexual disease and dysfunction. Furthermore the "homosexual agenda" is directly responsible for destroying society. My blood boils. Bob Soles (talk) 15:10, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, so you were using the word "gay" as a synonym for the generic words "spreading sexual disease and dysfunction"? Or did was that a quick way of implying that their position is "gay" in some way? Occasionaluse (talk) 15:13, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Woah! Don't get me - Bob Soles (talk) - confused with Ed. I'm busy pointing out that they're a hate site - who are, in my opinion, as bad as, for example, Stormfront. Bob Soles (talk) 15:15, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- I *suspect* Occ is messing with you. Just a guess, though.
- And god damn it if The Gay has the right to spread sexual illness, why do i not have that same right! I want to see a world where people's minds go batty cause of syphilus. that would be just uber cool. En attendant Godot 15:18, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Be quiet, you mere woman! Go to the back of the church with your head covered. Only by fully subjecting yourself to your husband can you lead a proper and fulfilling life. Bob Soles (talk) 15:24, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Them's jokes, Bob. Occasionaluse (talk) 15:52, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Be quiet, you mere woman! Go to the back of the church with your head covered. Only by fully subjecting yourself to your husband can you lead a proper and fulfilling life. Bob Soles (talk) 15:24, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- And god damn it if The Gay has the right to spread sexual illness, why do i not have that same right! I want to see a world where people's minds go batty cause of syphilus. that would be just uber cool.
- I *suspect* Occ is messing with you. Just a guess, though.
- Woah! Don't get me - Bob Soles (talk) - confused with Ed. I'm busy pointing out that they're a hate site - who are, in my opinion, as bad as, for example, Stormfront. Bob Soles (talk) 15:15, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, so you were using the word "gay" as a synonym for the generic words "spreading sexual disease and dysfunction"? Or did was that a quick way of implying that their position is "gay" in some way? Occasionaluse (talk) 15:13, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- This is directly saying that teh gays spread sexual disease and dysfunction. Furthermore the "homosexual agenda" is directly responsible for destroying society. My blood boils. Bob Soles (talk) 15:10, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
The Uganda topic[edit]
Is this number 2 here? 82.44.143.26 (talk) 17:06, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- That's a different thing, though. Avida Dollarsher again 17:25, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Define "topic." — Dr. Ox quack specialist 19:01, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Biblical marriage[edit]
Which of the following is being referred to?
- Incest (Adam and Eve, Noah's family)
- Polygamy (Solomon, marrying dead brother's widow etc)
- Being cuckolded by God.
- Various other arrangements which the PFRC would probably object to. 82.44.143.26 (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Dead site?[edit]
Links in the page are broken and go to some sort of irrelevant site. Tried looking through to find an alternate site, but found only RationalWiki links and Google doesn't show relevant sites. Wikipedia for Scott Lively
, apparently president of the site, doesn't show working links either. --It's-a me, 
LeftyGreenMario! 20:41, 7 August 2021 (UTC)