Talk:Refuting anti-LGBT+ arguments

	This sexuality related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Archives for this talk page:

<1>

, (new)

List vs tabular format

I think a sequence of heading/description is easier to read and visually scan, as opposed to the current table layout. Thoughts? Andmartinelli (talk) 06:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Re:"Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable."

I found this on yahoo answers:

Well, see, the later injunctions found in the Pauline letters are based on a misinterpretation of Leviticus 18:22. It's says that a man should not lie with another man as he would with a woman. All this means is a guy shouldn't tell his dude friends lies about income or sports accomplishments the way he would if was trying to impress a chick.

Is this true?—Hamburguesa con queso con un cara  (talk • stalk) 19:50, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

No. The people writing this sort of nonsense are homosexual crackpot "historical revisionists" like Afrocentrists. These homosexual historical revisionists are attempting to re-write history and remove anti-homosexuality in ancient cultures/religions.86.14.2.77 (talk) 20:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

it might be bullshit but they are not trying to rewrite history. They trying fine evidence that the religion that they may sincerely and deeply believe to be true, does not hate them. AMassiveGay (talk) 22:54, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Alright. I don't study the bible (because it's boring IMHO) so that's why I ask. If there are cranks that believe this, then it should be covered on the wiki somewhere.—Hamburguesa con queso con un cara  (talk • stalk) 23:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

"Well, see, the later injunctions found in the Pauline letters are based on a misinterpretation of Leviticus 18:22. It's says that a man should not lie with another man as he would with a woman. All this means is a guy shouldn't tell his dude friends lies about income or sports accomplishments the way he would if was trying to impress a chick." Yahoo answers is the best thing. Diacelium (talk) 22:56, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Lie in Bible = lie down = fuck. Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 00:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Transgender people and religion

Religious bigots against trans people often state: "God doesn't make mistakes". Maybe we should add a few refutes, such as:

• God works in mysterious ways, if they exist at all
• Religion cannot deny the existence of something, as that would be like denying trees because of religion

--2601:197:801:49E0:DE79:EF00:A7CE:8543 (talk) 00:43, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Fun:List of mistakes made by God is a good page to look through. Food for thought. --It's-a me, 🎄LeftyGreenMario!🎄 00:47, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

”God doesn’t make mistakes. Therefore, if someone is trans, then God meant for them to be trans. Dare you question His will?” Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano^{Make a Reservation} 01:05, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

PROBLEMATIC ARTICLE

don't use intersex people to promote your NMGB (non materialistic gender beliefs) ^{— Unsigned, by: 2601:152:a80:4d30:69e5:23f0:49df:d7fd / talk / contribs}

refuting section

It says that if homosexuality were against God's plan, he wouldn't have created. I'm all for gay people, but holy shit, that's the worst argument ever. That's like saying that God gave some people the urge to murder so it must be okay.^{— Unsigned, by: 108.24.127.83 / talk / contribs}

I think the idea goes if an omnipotent god hated homosexuals, he could have made a world where it is impossible to be gay. Ioe bidome (talk) 19:48, 16 December 2024 (UTC)