Talk:Refuting anti-LGBT+ arguments/Archive1

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an archive page, last updated 16 December 2024. Please do not make edits to this page.
Archives for this talk page:  , (new)(back)

Title[edit]

I tried to put in references, but I don't know what I am doing wrong. I could use a little help--Rationalzombie94 (talk) 23:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

You forgot to add the reflist template. :)-ᎠᎥamᎧndᎠᎥᎦᏣ1(talk) 23:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

This would work far better[edit]

in LGBT. On its own, it will never be seen. The FCP Foundation (talk/stalk) 00:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Agreed.—€h33s3βurg3rF@€3 Spinning-Burger.gif (talkstalk) 19:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

health arguments against homosexuality cannot be refuted[edit]

As an example- "Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men are 17 times more likely to get anal cancer than heterosexual men." https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/std.htm 86.14.2.77 (talk) 04:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Annnnd in any way how does this info, assuming its correct, affect the worth of a bisexual like me? Bugger off--Pokefrazer (talk) 04:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Much of this can be prevented with the HPV vaccine: https://blogs.cdc.gov/cancer/2022/10/21/new-data-show-that-many-hpv-associated-cancers-can-be-prevented/ . Mpox was largely tackled with vaccines: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/16/opinion/gay-men-mpox.html . These days HIV/AIDS can be widely prevented with PrEP too although cost is a current issue. Chillpilled (talk) 22:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)