Talk:Refuting anti-LGBT+ arguments/Archive1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is an archive page, last updated 16 December 2024. Please do not make edits to this page.
Archives for this talk page: , (back)
Title[edit]
I tried to put in references, but I don't know what I am doing wrong. I could use a little help--Rationalzombie94 (talk) 23:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- You forgot to add the reflist template. :)-ᎠᎥamᎧndᎠᎥᎦᏣ1(talk) 23:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
This would work far better[edit]
in LGBT. On its own, it will never be seen. The FCP Foundation (talk/stalk) 00:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- Agreed.—€h33s3βurg3rF@€3 (talk • stalk) 19:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
health arguments against homosexuality cannot be refuted[edit]
As an example- "Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men are 17 times more likely to get anal cancer than heterosexual men." https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/std.htm 86.14.2.77 (talk) 04:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- Annnnd in any way how does this info, assuming its correct, affect the worth of a bisexual like me? Bugger off--Pokefrazer (talk) 04:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- Much of this can be prevented with the HPV vaccine: https://blogs.cdc.gov/cancer/2022/10/21/new-data-show-that-many-hpv-associated-cancers-can-be-prevented/ . Mpox was largely tackled with vaccines: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/16/opinion/gay-men-mpox.html . These days HIV/AIDS can be widely prevented with PrEP too although cost is a current issue. Chillpilled (talk) 22:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)