User talk:2friedeggs

From RationalWiki
(Redirected from User talk:Pokefrazer)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to RationalWiki, Pokefrazer![edit]

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

If you are interested in contributing, please read what our articles are intended to be.

You can tell us how you found RationalWiki here.--ZooGuard (talk) 19:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Probably not insane[edit]

YOU'RE HEALED! - David Gerard (talk) 10:20, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Eh? I come back two weeks later after taking a sabbatical, and somehow I have responsibilities?? Where's my mop!?--Pokefrazer (talk) 18:05, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Link spam[edit]

Eh, it was pretty funny. No harm having another conspiracy theorist on our conspiracy theory talkpage! ;) FuzzyCatPotato!™ (talk/stalk) 11:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

are you sure[edit]

Are you sure about removing the stuff on the tvc article? It seemed fine. -— Unsigned, by: Godonaldgo / talk / contribs

You must be new[edit]

Actually, how this works is I'Ll just refresh my IP address and create a new account, and because even the most mature person on this site has demonstrated that he cannot be trusted with CheckUser access, there's not a damn thing you can do about it. Sporky (talk) 04:07, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

If you believe that's the best use of your time, then that's up to you.--Spoony (talk) 04:09, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Minor edit[edit]

Hi, Just a note from Help: *Minor edit (spelling, grammar, adding refs/cats etc.):

Checking the minor edit box signifies that the current and previous versions differ only superficially (typographical corrections, etc.), in a way that no editor would be expected to regard as disputable. Scream!! (talk) 12:38, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Yup got it! --Spoony (talk) 13:09, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

What I said on "Talk" by Joe Biden.[edit]

What do you think about this in detail? Indeed, there are many South Koreans who perceive American politics in that way. However, some of them are conservatives, but some hate (PPP)conservative and DPK and support the Justice Party. I want to know in detail what locals in the United States think about this issue. --Umaru16 (talk) 09:53, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

I know literally nothing on South Korea other than that one meme song from 2012 and their sizeable Christian minority. You are asking the wrong person. I just found the wall of text to be amazing.--Spoony (talk) 10:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring[edit]

Asking someone to provide a reference to an unsourced claim is not trolling. If that person continues to add the information without a reference despite multiple people disputing it in the talk page, that's edit warring. It's not people just blocking people they disagree with when people repeatedly add unsourced claims without properly engaging in the talk page. There's a reason why most wikis have zero tolerance for this behavior, and I respectfully ask you to stop enabling/participating in this behavior. Thanks. Plutocow (talk) 18:54, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

That's exactly what I was reverting but ehh whatever helps you sleep at night I guess--Spoony (talk) 19:00, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
No, you were calling people "bullies" for reverting an edit warrior who refused to provide sources. Please stop with that. Plutocow (talk) 19:03, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
lol bullying --Spoony (talk) 19:07, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
You were saying? Plutocow (talk) 19:14, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Thought you were talking about the argument on the talk page that escalated the minute a particular user got involved again who was banned earlier. At the end of the day it was hyperbole I forgot about using. Still pretty convinced multiple users saw the content of the edit and immediately made up their minds though--Spoony (talk) 19:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Did a solid Ctrl + F on the whole fiasco and found nothing of the sort so I'm just going to categorize this one as "lying"--Back2theroots34 (talk) 19:05, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
You didn't look at the edit summaries or the block reasons. Top-notch detective work, there, champ. Queexchthonic murmurings 19:31, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Yeah I wouldn't personally call this an accurate way the events took place but I have a 6 pack in front of me I find far more important right now.--Back2theroots34 (talk) 18:57, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Also, genius[edit]

"Autopatrolled" and "autoconfirmed" are not the same thing, so I still can't edit ATIM. Spoony is a Coward (talk) 07:31, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

If you can't do the time, don't do the crime... Or something--Spoony (talk) 07:34, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Says the person who just violated CS. Spoony is a Coward (talk) 07:35, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
"In some extreme cases, where a sysop is being particularly disruptive, another sysop may need to "promote" them as soon as possible to prevent further vandalism or abuse, but they must then discuss their decision with others at the Chicken Coop page or All Things in Moderation, to determine whether the user should remain de-sysoped. "

Actually I didn't but I don't really want to make this a big problem so oh well, you were warned.--Spoony (talk) 07:37, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, rolling back a couple of talk page edits isn't significant disruption. This is coming from someone who was socking and edit warring the Gnosticism page not too long ago. Spoony is a Coward (talk) 07:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Yeah yeah yeah whatever helps you sleep at night yawn--Spoony (talk) 07:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop messing with my talkpage. Especially don't add back blatant troll edits like the one from the "Yaush" dingus. Plutocow (talk) 07:49, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

It was a blanket revert because you're removing my warnings.--Spoony (talk) 07:58, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
It's at ATIM now, you can cut it out. Plutocow (talk) 08:13, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
When people complain and get their edits reverted, they tend not to particularly appreciate it. Stop threatening.--Spoony (talk) 08:14, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
What am I even threatening? It's already at ATIM, whatever will happen will happen. I'd just recommend not digging yourself deeper. Plutocow (talk) 08:15, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
"Digging yourself deeper" dude that's threatening. Why do you always need the last word?--Spoony (talk) 08:26, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Regarding the issue in ATIM[edit]

Plutocow is out of control. Unban my account so I can bring this up in ATIM and unban my sock.--Spoony (talk) 00:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

still out of control a month later--Spoony (talk) 23:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

What part of the CS do you not understand?[edit]

About your Drug Article Edits.[edit]

What are they exactly based on? If they are based on personal experience and you are trying to present them as something others will definitely experience if they try the drug that maybe keep that stuff out. It's fine to add some snark or jokes but don't try to pass drug experiences or withdrawal experiences off as a universal or even generalizable without direct reference to clinical studies. Drug effects are highly variable from person to person, and the experience of one person is a just that. I can see some edits are meant just as quippy jokes, that's fine as long as the intent is obvious but see others were you are describing the withdrawal as "not bad" and detailing effects and that sort of thing is going to require citations. - Only Sort of Dumb (talk) 05:04, 13 April 2022 (UTC).

I assume that's on the MDMA article. I never said the withdrawal is "not bad" and anyone trying to roll consistently will be in for a very rude awakening if that was their takeaway. The problem with drugs is that experiences are inherently subjective. What I wrote has been general consensus in a very, very screwed up community of people.

If you mean the Tobacco article, Nicotine is literally like that.--Spoony (talk) 05:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

There is academic articles you can cite for sampled self-reports of drug users you can use to cite commonly reported effects. I don't think any one person can act as a spokeperson on the behalf of some presumed community. Being that they are subjective you probably should refrain from making any definite claims about the experience without something else to source from. Also in general too it's better not to make references to supposed cases or events that you don't have a citation for. These articles are not really supposed to be speculations about things you have "heard" - Only Sort of Dumb (talk) 05:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC).
This isn't wikipedia, I don't need to necessarily cite academic sources. I don't claim to be a spokesperson for any community, especially this one, nor do I want to be. Nicotine has consistent effects. Calling at an "opioid" is not personal experience, thats just what it is at high doses. Saying "it makes me dizzy and giggle a little bit" would be personal experience. If you made this complaint on something like LSD then I would understand.--Spoony (talk) 05:20, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Something being an opioid requires that it's analgesic and that it acts upon opioid receptors in the brain, to establish the drug as being such you need to a cite a source suggesting that nicotine does in fact do this; which isn't hard to find. A quick google already gives me results for clinical studies that talk of mu opioid binding in the brain by nicotine. This is not Wikipedia but that doesn't mean we throw out any requirement to be factual or evidence based out the window. That literally goes against what Rationalwiki stands for. Every drug for the most part have relatively consistent effects reported across pharmacological research but the problem is that these individualized effects are highly variable given the individual variation for things like body fat percentage, receptor density, sensitivity, tolerance, metabolism, etc. The consistent effects often have to be isolated out through the use of statistical methods compared to some control. It's not that difficult to find sources on drug effects that have been systematically gathered. Not being wikipedia isn't permission to be intellectually lazy. - Only Sort of Dumb (talk) 05:29, 13 April 2022 (UTC).

Edit Conflicts[edit]

This edit makes several times I've seen you delete other users' comments when adding your own. I'm assuming this is because of something you're doing in the edit conflict screen. Just making sure you're aware; I can't offer any advice, since I don't really know what you're doing. 𝒮𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓃𝑒 talk 01:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

I literally don't remember doing that. My personal theories are either alcohol inhibiting my memory (unlikely because it's beer), edit conflicts or just plain not paying attention. Either way I'm sorry, that's not what I meant to do.--Spoony (talk) 01:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
It's from edit conflicts, I think, when you overwrite someone else's edits. If it happens once or twice, just an accident, but be careful. CorruptUser 02:38, 29 April 2022 (UTC)


You are being annoying. At this rate you might get blocked. Stop this. GeeJayK (talk) 10:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Who are you lol::Spoony (talk) 11:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
I told you this was going to happen... GeeJayK (talk) 12:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Lol telling you went on my page but not theirs.--Spoony (talk) 19:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

your the one refusing to swallow ur pride (talk) 14:19, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Why did you feel the need to come here over a week after the fiasco?--2friedeggs (talk) 23:58, 14 May 2022 (UTC)


@Cosmikdebris What did I do this time. Things are hot right now, but that doesn't mean you have to be abusive with the blocks. --2friedeggs (talk) 04:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Oh you're the guy who thought we should be banned for a month, that explains it.--2friedeggs (talk) 04:39, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Nothing personal, just be careful with the overzealous removal of talk page comments. Your edits are going to get scrutinized more closely as long as you continue this whole shitstorm drama on the wiki.
I think you both should step away from this place for a while. It can only do you good. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 22:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
We should avoid eachother for awhile. Sick of something getting started and both of us getting blocked. Beyond that I do agree with them about just getting the vote over with early. Sick of GC making more people by the week dislike him, sick of Pluto for dragging it out, sick of myself for humoring this circus of an incident, sick of ATIM for lasting a whole week.--2friedeggs (talk) 22:17, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Interaction ban[edit]

This is a formal notice that you are hereby banned from interacting with User:Plutocow.

Specifically, you are banned from doing the following actions:

  • Edit their user talk page. This extends to subpages in their userspace and essay talkpages.
  • Reply to them in discussions. Participation in the same discussions is still permitted, but direct responses are not.
  • Reference them anywhere on RationalWiki, directly or indirectly.
  • Revert their edits in any shape, way or form through the MediaWiki interface.

This sanction can be enforced by any sysop with incrementing blocks and attached talk page notices. Repeated violation may result in another Chicken coop or ATIM case being raised against you with the potential for further sanctions.
TranslationForAll (talk) 00:57, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Awesome.--2friedeggs (talk) 00:58, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Would advise just taking him to ATIM[edit]

He's dysosped a lot people, and all he does is cause issues and not contribute2600:8806:0:C2:9C38:7B03:53F6:5A0C (talk) 00:53, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Who is this, is that you Andrew?--2friedeggs (talk) 00:54, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Him as in grammarcommie, look at his contribs, he hasn't contributed any more than like 200 bytes to mainspace articles since at least last year. He's a popcorn crowd wikilawyer who leverages a few connections to drool down the throat of anyone he has any minor issue with. 2600:8806:0:C2:9C38:7B03:53F6:5A0C (talk) 00:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
He got dysoped after a chicken coop, and no idea how grammar got his sysop back, but he lost that chick coop for a good reason, including, but not limited to threatening self harm if he feels annoyed, messing with people's userpage and talkpage comments, randomly desysopping people without going to mod pages, and on and on. He's a real bad actor here. 2600:8806:0:C2:9C38:7B03:53F6:5A0C (talk) 00:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Give me evidence of all this and tell me who you are, if doing so on here is social suicide add me on Discord twofriedeggs#3485--2friedeggs (talk) 00:59, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Sent a request, but imma stay out of it, just giving a heads up that i'm not the only (old) user who left because of him 2600:8806:0:C2:9C38:7B03:53F6:5A0C (talk) 01:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
This wiki is also not worth the effort to stick around. I gave up too after designed ineptitude of this community to resolve conflicts that would've been far more easily handled in other communities. 2601:647:5F00:C4D0:5151:10EB:9DDC:C252 (talk) 09:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
No offense but BoNs are generally viewed with suspicion and I've seen probably 5 people expressing this same sentiment the past 2 days alone but I only know two with an actual account people know of.--2friedeggs (talk) 09:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
I am aware. You'll have to take my word for it unfortunately but with this IP currently, I'm not trying to inflate the numbers with ip hopping and whatnot. 2601:647:5F00:C4D0:5151:10EB:9DDC:C252 (talk) 17:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Inciting incident[edit]

Exhibit A ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 02:41, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

All I see is you making personal attacks. If anything you should be the one banned for constant personal attacks. So uh, thanks for incriminating yourself dude.--3friedeggs (talk) 02:59, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
You have the most amazing case of willful blindness I've ever seen. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 03:05, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Funny, last time someone said something like this to me it's after I told them their conspiracy theories has no evidence and I didn't listen to their survivalist news sites.--2friedeggs (talk) 03:07, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Gee, I wonder why I have the impression that you're acting dishonestly... Maybe it's because I literally show you trolling and you downplay it so you, and apparently no one else, can feud with me? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 03:20, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
You were already warned not to desysop without an ATIM vote. Is this where you want it to go? You reap what you sow.--2friedeggs (talk) 03:21, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Get off your high fucking horse, you fucking deluded halfwit. Your nasty habit of molehill mountaineering is beginning to get on my nerves. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 03:25, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Oh, and I wouldn't have taken your mop again if your head wasn't up your ass so much that you feel compelled to unblock a troll. Just saying. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 03:26, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Baseless personal attacks. You know full well you are not allowed to, you are minimizing and belittling the issue.--2friedeggs (talk) 03:30, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
You know what, fine. Take your half dead site, where most of you twits obsess over one or two articles and et the rest of the site rot, where I can't even perform basic category maintenance without someone getting on my ass, which by the way is why i haven't touched mainspace in ages, where trolls are humored as long as there's the barest minimum level of plausible deniability, and shove it right up your fucking ass. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 03:49, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
So you desysop me, ban me, type this out then ban yourself see you in a week I guess--3friedeggs (talk) 03:56, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

GC will eat his words and return to this "half dead site" that is filled with "twits". Bradley (talk) 23:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Pious fraud[edit]

The header quote I added is not from the poem. It's from the video game: Dante's Inferno released in 2010. I'd appreciate it if you stopped removing it. BJA2112 (talk) 23:45, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

I didn't notice your note when I removed it the second time, you're good dude. I'll leave it there.--2friedeggs (talk) 23:47, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
No worries. Glad it's been cleared up! 🙂 BJA2112 (talk) 23:48, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Just leave him be[edit]

It’s his talkpage, so he can remove whatever’s not urgent. It’s not like he spys on Andrew to see what comments to remove and block. (talk) 01:14, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Chicken coop[edit]

One case involving you has been raised there. Well let's try it. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 03:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Yeah idk how the coop works compared to ATIM might wait for other users to weigh in--2friedeggs (talk) 03:12, 5 July 2022 (UTC)


It's far funnier than 2friedeggs. You should use that name instead. GeeJayK (talk) 15:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)


Kauri0.o (talk) 01:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Bro I'm not even leaving or being banned pay attention before you decide to be annoying or outright lie to people--2friedeggs (talk) 01:35, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

answering your question[edit]

re: atim -- top conservapedia admin secretly leaked info of ken which I stumbled across -- notwithstanding crass and petty nature his rants are simple anyone with half a brain cell can EASILY identify Low computer battery (talk) 20:31, 9 July 2022 (UTC)


Do not edit war and do not try to use another account to get around a block. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 15:00, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

No stop. Stop right there so I can get this straight:
1. Right after I and GC get sysop revoked for reasons people get away with on here daily, kauri :comes on with an axe to grind and reverts the incel page
2. When i tell him to go to the talk page, he starts reverting my old edits
3. He comes on weeks later after realizing he didnt get away with it to do it again and I stop :him, then Cosmik comes on then calls my writing bad and reverts it too
4.I make an edit to the original version to appease him and tell him to not start with me, so :he bans me, something **specifically** against the TOS, and something I would have been ATIM'd :immediately for. I bring this up and his response is basically "come at me bro"
5.Right after, **you** are magically on, revert my replies to his nonsense pantronizing, then :extent my bans. Nevermind the fact that Plutocow got away with ban evasion when it happened to :her. and **then** you revert my edits to gnosticism.
If this is seriously how it is, block me indefinitely. Not only are you making it VERY clear I'm not welcome here, 8 years was enough. It'll overall be better for me than trying to tango with a bunch of axe-grinders who go to mods like spoiled children to game the system when they feel sleighted.
Holycrap no wonder GC was so cynical on here.--2A0B:F4C0:16C:1:0:0:0:1 (talk) 15:18, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
I'm not buying any of this. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 15:25, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
I don't blame you, mods are barely on here. You don't have to though. That's literally what happened and anyone who remotely cares about what actually happened enough to go look at the revision histories will notice this. Remember what i said weeks ago in the coop? Here, I'll refresh your memory. This is the very scenario playing out, the exact thing I feared has just happened.
I say all this with the hope that Cosmik didn't just come to you all "mommy, mommy, he called me a name! Punish him!"-2A0B:F4C0:16C:9:0:0:0:1 (talk) 15:35, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
I looked at logs. I also noted your general attitude toward people from your reply alone. You're still sysoprevoked. Try another strategy because that's not working in your favor. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 01:05, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
"Strategy" if that's how you genuinely are viewing the situation no wonder I feel ganged up on and no wonder the mods do nothing. They're fake too.--2friedeggs (talk) 03:35, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Coop Notice[edit]

A case involving you has been raised at the Chicken Coop. Feel free to comment.

71.208.x.x (talk) 18:09, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
How courteous. You guys humiliate me, ban me, then unban me for a week to do so further. Never change.--2friedeggs (talk) 18:14, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Deletion notice[edit]

Red x.svg Someone wanted to let you know that they think AprilStudios, a page you created, should be deleted, arguing that "it's an overly short and poorly-written article that fails RW's notability guidelines."
Please discuss this assassination attempt on this article's entry on AprilStudios's Articles for deletion page if you wish to defend your creation.

Sincerely, Postuhenin the neurodivergent doodlebug! (say hi! ^^) 22:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)