User talk:

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
New logo large.png Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best,

This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble.

We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives.

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you.

If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.

Promoting Holocaust denial? Yup, that merits an unwelcome in these parts. ScepticWombat (talk) 15:24, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Look, make damn sure your source matches your claims before you add more nonsense to Stopped clock. PacWalker 09:55, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Better yet, take your silly apologetics to the talk page and let someone else give you the firm sorting-out you need. PacWalker 12:17, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

I did warn you[edit]

Post here if you have any sort of reason to be unblocked. That you're being "censored" isn't good enough. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 14:16, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Alright I'll give it a try... because the blockage is pude DramaQueenism of your part? (talk) 16:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
It's your playground and you choose when to plant a turd in the middle. Bullies only "reason" to a bloody nose and yours is out of reach. (talk) 14:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
I'm just so mean, banning poor little you for a whole day just for being an antagonistic shit. Oh boo hoo. Come on, give me a reason to unban you and I will. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 14:50, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
So you needed to feel mean and therefore your infantile "ultimatums". Grow up and learn to live with "antagonism", the day your mom farts you out of the basement and meet the real world you'll find out what the concept means. (talk) 15:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Argumentum ad cellarium FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 15:21, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Psychological projection much? You don't seem like the type that has a healthy relationship. Are you feeling OK? Do you really like how your life is turning out? CorruptUser (talk) 15:22, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Are you having fun? Do you know how to persuade anybody that your views are worth the time it takes to read them? CamelCasePragmatist (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
I vaguely wonder if 145 isn't taking his cue from that Right Stuff exhortation to troll us so as to spread the word. Or maybe he really does believe what he purports to. Doxys Midnight Runner (talk) 15:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC) has maybe 1 comment on all of its blogs, so I'd bet the amount of its readerbase that cares enough to troll is pretty low. Herr FuzzyKatzenPotato (talk/stalk) 15:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
  • If you do X you will suffer punishment Y
  • You don't want to suffer punishment Y
  • Therefore you're an idiot, the Holohoax happened and gay is the way. (talk) 20:06, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
The punishment wasn't for honestly engaging, a question after a series of trolling. Being a holocaust denying shithead is just cream on the terrible-person pie. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 20:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
I see, instead you're the "crème de la crème", tightly packed pure chocolate fudge. Seeing dissent as trolling is one telltale of a feeble mind. (talk) 20:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Drama Queens[edit]

One dissenting ... I mean "antagonist" post every 30 minutes is more than the self-esteem of the sexually disoriented social rejects here are able to digest, so it seems. (talk) 16:08, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

You're absolutely correct! There's no alternate interpretation of the current situation! FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 16:24, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
You have truly cracked our code and we are even now melting, proper Oz style. Queexchthonic murmurings 16:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Yet you keep coming back to a place you hate and doesn't want you. Sad when people seek out the only attention they can get, even if it's entirely negative :-) -EmeraldCityWanderer (talk) 17:07, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Information icon.svg This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it.

We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.