User talk:175.193.212.64

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, anonymous editor! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun! While you are free to continue to edit as, and be identified by, your IP address, you might prefer to create an account (they're free!), or log in if you already have one. If you create an account, your IP address will not be displayed and you will face fewer editing restrictions.

Cool yourself down a touch mate, and explain your views. Also refrain from personal attacks. The Invisible Man^{I spoke to Him} 11:13, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

I think the real question is...

Why are you so obsessed with race? It doesn't matter. You can't judge people based on generalizations. Just let it go.--"Shut up, Brx." 04:58, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Maybe a better question is why so many write pseudoscientific nonsense on the subject in online encyclopedias. It "doesn't matter" right? Mikemikev (talk) 06:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

It matters when people use that kind of bullshit to justify apartheid and segregation, racial profiling, genocide, xenophobia, and institutional racism.--"Shut up, Brx." 06:07, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Sure that matters. That doesn't mean "race doesn't exist". It isn't "bullshit". And race classification/ignoring race classification can also have an unfair negative impact on whites, which nobody seems to care about. The political implications are entirely independent of the scientific question. Mikemikev (talk) 06:33, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

How on Earth does racism make things fairer for white people? Second of all, real scientists recognize that categorizing humans based on race is a futile exercise. Superficial characteristics such as skin color and ancestry are meaningless in the face of individuality.--"Shut up, Brx." 17:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Well this may have escaped your notice but most countries have jus sanguinis naturalization laws. Only the West has this bizarre notion that "race doesn't exist", largely through Marxist domination of the social sciences (starting with Boas) and media. You've been brainwashed into supporting the suicide of your people sucker! Saying that ancestry is meaningless is ludicrous and false. 175.193.212.64 (talk) 02:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

1. I am a communist
2. I see the idea of nations as a bad thing and would prefer a one-world-government
3. If by the suicide of my people, you mean, say, the the eventual disappearance of light skin, then let me tell you that I could care less about what color future generations might be.

Basically, what I'm saying is that you're barking up the wrong tree.

But enough about me, what about you? I'd like to play a little game. I'll call it "How's it feel to be on the other end of the chain?"

What ethnicity are you? Anglo-Saxon? Germanic? Celtic? You know, your ancestors seem to have had a propensity for warfare and conquest. Hmm... I don't think we should let you walk around freely. You may start a war or something. It would be much better to keep you down as a second-class citizen based on your "race." And we wouldn't want your tainted, murderer genes to contaminate anybody else. So you aren't allowed to marry outside your race. And you know, being from a warrior species means it's a lot likelier that you'll be a career criminal. So we'll give you stiffer penalties based upon this. And if a crime gets committed and we don't know who did it, we'll just finger you for it anyways, because even if you didn't do it, you did something else, so it's okay. It's not racism, it's not hate, it's just being realistic.--"Shut up, Brx." 14:17, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Oh, only whites engaged in warfare and conquest. You should make your thoroughly evil propaganda less laughable. 175.193.212.64 (talk) 15:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

And I notice in your rush to betray/attack the White race, you ignored my point that no other countries are committing national suicide. That was central. So you aren't going to have a "one world government" (you delusional fool), you are just going to have no whites. You know, those guys that invent everything. I am a Celt BTW, and you? And when I say Marxist domination, I of course mean Jew domination. Jews do not believe in Communism or equality of course but use it to attack other nations via useful idiots. 175.193.212.64 (talk) 16:12, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Okay, no, you missed the point entirely. I was positing that stereotyping someone based on their "race" is a moronic idea, but you went straight to pathetic. And I'm not going to dignify your anti-semitic conspiracy theories with a response.--"Shut up, Brx." 16:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

I wasn't even talking about stereotyping I was talking about jus sanguinis, national homelands, and unilateral white disestablishment pushed by Jews in media and academia. You are not addressing my argument, just throwing out kneejerk race related points. You should read "Culture of Critique", pdf online, if you can read. So what race are you? 175.193.212.64 (talk) 17:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Sense ...

... to make supposed was that? Scream!! (talk)

Of course it makes sense. Your problem is that it contradicts the PC narrative washed into your brain, causing cognitive dissonance. You see, "race doesn't exist" when it comes to IQ tests, but it does when deciding what historical atrocities to list and deciding what shootings to put on the news. Try reading "1984", the concept of double think is relevant here. 175.193.212.64 (talk) 09:13, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

"Minor Edits" issue

It's the Mediawiki software itself that marks use of the rollback button as a minor edit. Hydrogen and Time (talk) 13:37, 23 April 2013 (UTC)