User talk:2605:B100:B3C:F394:B5EB:FF11:54E9:50D1

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, anonymous editor! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun! While you are free to continue to edit as, and be identified by, your IP address, you might prefer to create an account (they're free!), or log in if you already have one. If you create an account, your IP address will not be displayed and you will face fewer editing restrictions.

Please do not engage in edit warring. Discuss the changes on the article's talk page. Those changes have already been reverted by multiple editors. Omicron (talk) 20:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

To clarify, please do not remove existing talk page discussion. Rather, add your own topic, or add a comment to an existing discussion. Omicron (talk) 20:44, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

This has been tried before. Mods on talk page removed the discussion. There is a lack of good faith on the part of the mods here.

Go away. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 20:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Naah i'm good here. Please don't act childish again.

On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: on the toolbar above the edit panel. You can also indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line. Thank you. Christopher (talk) 21:01, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Would love to but LeftyGreenMario has locked the talk page for non-logged in users. Disappointing that discussion has been censored and stifled by this mod again.156.34.53.54 (talk) 21:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

For what its worth, categories are primarily intended to help editors navigate. The creationism navigation is, I assume, either because this content is more closely related to other wiki content on creationism, or creationists are somehow involved with the book (which is discussed a bit in the article). Omicron (talk) 21:02, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

The book is not on a creationist topic nor are the authors creationists. No creationist was involved in the book. As such, the template is not accurate.156.34.53.54 (talk) 21:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Don't argue with good faith with this editor. They've admitted to reregging (also see my comment of what that edit is responding to) just to continue arguing. Just keep reverting when you see them. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 21:04, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Please grow up and discuss in a civilized manner. 156.34.53.54 (talk) 21:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

@LeftyGreenMario I see. I already added a reply on the talkpage; if they keep coming back I'll revert, but if anybody else comes along and wonders what the deal is, they'll be able to find out on the talkpage. I think that, at least, is alright. Omicron (talk) 21:09, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Does not address the fact that discussion now cannot take place on the talk page. "Talk" should be allowed on the "talk page."156.34.53.54 (talk) 21:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Yeah. I'm really sorry if I give off weird protection vibes but I did leave some background on the talk page over there, and if you can understand I was utterly exhausted by this exchange, that'll help! --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 21:15, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Exhaustion is a poor excuse for shutting down discussion because you can't handle being shown to be wrong on a point/topic156.34.53.54 (talk) 21:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)