| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
User talk:99.72.28.196
Hey fella. Welcome to RationalWiki. On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button:
on the toolbar above the edit panel. You can also indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line. Thank you. Щєазєюіδ
Methinks it is a Weasel 21:50, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
evidence of evolution being a hoax[edit]
We seem to be getting nowhere on the other talk page, I think we are talking past each other. I have two questions for you
1) what is the logical fallacy that we are committing on the page?
2) can you think of any evidence that indicates that evolution is a hoax?
Interestingly the page is not arguing that evolution is true (or creationism is false) it is just pointing out to the people that say evolution is a hoax (ie a conscious fraud perpetrated by scientists) that there is no evidence for their proposition. --DamoHi 04:36, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Signing[edit]
Hi. Could you remember to sign you posts? The procedure is explained above. Thanks.--BobSpring is sprung! 06:46, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed the page only says that there is no scientific evidence for the proposition that evolution is a hoax. Whether there are valid types of evidence that are not scientific depends on your worldview. 䯂 (talk) 04:46, 11 April 2011 (UTC)