User talk:Albion Tourgee the Younger

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Albion Tourgee the Younger!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

I see you don't use the proper naming convention, I am 99% sure we'll never see an insightful edit from you. Like Obama. AceMcWicked 21:04, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

"Ace" (sounds like another self-centered liberal, like Obama), you act like liberal/conservative are symmetric with respect to the truth. That's plainly false, as illustrated by our entry on deceit. I looked at many of your edits before reverting them and you deny that liberals get a thrill out of deceit for its own sake alone, so there's a 95% chance you're here to do harm to family values. I urge you, I beseech you, I beg you: accept that translating the Bible deters school shootings. Do yourself a favor and admit that Fred Phelps is a liberal and a Democrat. I haven't seen you admit you're wrong about anything yet. I'll ask the simple question one last time, do you ever admit you're wrong?? After a while, the liberal nonsense is so obvious that we don't even bother commenting on it.--aschlafly

Adding footnotes[edit]

Hey Albion. Your edit probably got reverted because the placement of the link was a bit random. If you intend it as a footnote, you should use the <ref> tag. Here's an example of your footnote attached to an arbitrary bit of text from the Originalism article:

Originalism refers to a school of thought concerning the interpretation of law by a judge. The idea behind originalism is that a law must be interpreted from the viewpoints extant at the time of its inception and not those of the present day. Originalism is popular with United States conservatives in general and conservative U.S. judges in particular.<ref>[http://www.libertary.com/books/unoriginal-misunderstanding Unoriginal Misunderstanding by Kenneth Shear (Libertary Editions 2009)]</ref> This can be best observed in the push for originalist judges to be nominated to positions where constitutional law cases will most likely be heard.

Just copy the underlined portion in to the source of the article. I don't know anything about that book, so I can't personally add the footnote.--ConcernedresidentAsk me about your mother 21:33, 1 November 2009 (UTC)