User talk:Aphoxema
How do you explain evolution in regards to the undeniable worldwide flooding that no one denies occurred? AceX-102 23:14, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Every time...[edit]
... I see your userpage comment, I read Homo asphyxia, which must have played hell with survival of the fittest... --PsyGremlinHable! 16:54, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ahh, now that I'm over choking on a dorito laughing I can properly thank you for the attempted accidental homicide.Aphoxema (talk) 19:24, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Sysop[edit]
You is one. 19:56, 17 September 2010 (UTC) 
- Bwahahaha! Fools! You have given me untold power beyond power and now I shall destroy all rationalism so that my Conservapedia masters can unleash some Jesus on the world! Liberate the proletariat! Smash the state! Anarchy Jesus on Wheels tonight in the Lightning Arena! Sunday, Sunday, Sunday! LIVE ON PAY PER VIEW! Aphoxema (talk) 20:18, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oi! Before you embark on your crusade of wiki domination, you forgot your bucket and mop. --PsyGremlin말하십시오 20:37, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- Huh? Responsibility instead of just being a pawn in someone else's game? Piss on you, CP! Aphoxema (talk) 20:45, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, welcome to the Dark Side. And no... I'm not your father. --PsyGremlinPrata! 21:00, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- Huh? Responsibility instead of just being a pawn in someone else's game? Piss on you, CP! Aphoxema (talk) 20:45, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oi! Before you embark on your crusade of wiki domination, you forgot your bucket and mop. --PsyGremlin말하십시오 20:37, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Sysop?![edit]
Oh snap, I have been bestowed the greatest, most incredible power of all! That is... an improved status for responding to vandalism that I have not yet witnessed in the few weeks I've been reading RationalWiki. Now, no longer simply wielding a broom and dustpan I possess a mop and bucket!
Truly, yes, I have done much work to earn this position. I have resisted the urge to needlessly blank pages. I wrested control of my fingers so that I would not destroy other, lesser people with the incredible finesse with argument. I have saved possibly millions, if not billions of lives by submitting small but vital changes to articles! And for all of my generosity to Humanity, I have been awarded something I didn't even realize I was seeking!
All this excitement has tired me out, I'm going to go take a nap now!
Aphoxema (talk) 21:28, 17 September 2010 (UTC) (Great and powerful ruler)
WHAT A TWIST![edit]
Classic. Awesome. Keep it up! --Eira OMTG! The Goat be Praised. 23:12, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- I am enjoying this site probably more than I should... Aphoxema (talk) 23:14, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Oh, okay, I'll just be on my merry way, then![edit]
ROFLMAO!!! Nice retort! You left me dumbfounded! Conservative Punk (talk) 00:35, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
You did it again ;)[edit]
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Guantanamo_Bay&curid=13214&diff=665530&oldid=657235
A great bunch of writing, but not much to do with the topic. Writing about prisons in general at an article called Guantanamo Bay just drifts off topic. Note the red link. We have article about prisons. Perhaps you might enjoy creating new articles when one we have spurs you to your (much appreciated) creative responses to it? Look, I'ma gonna have to severely prune what you added there, but can you grab the diff and perhaps start something new? Ping me anytime if you need help along the way, technical or editorial or site-political. ħuman
02:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- That is just fine and I will happily create the new article, and will do that from now on with things relevant to the mission statement. Aphoxema (talk) 13:13, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Excellent, you write good stuff, no need to cram it into spaces too small to hold it. I hope you know how to create new articles, in general? ħuman 01:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Just went there, very nice, thank you for playing along. ħuman 01:32, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- I'm getting used to MediaWiki, it's not as archaic as it first seemed to me. In a lot of ways it's more useful because instead of being limited to a specific format for building information. The whole thing feels more like a book without having to worry about eraser marks. However, I think for general discussing there's a lot of benefit in something like phpBB. Aphoxema (talk) 02:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- We have something a lot like that in our forums. Middle link under "community", top left. ħuman 03:42, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- We have something a lot like that in our forums. Middle link under "community", top left. ħuman
- I'm getting used to MediaWiki, it's not as archaic as it first seemed to me. In a lot of ways it's more useful because instead of being limited to a specific format for building information. The whole thing feels more like a book without having to worry about eraser marks. However, I think for general discussing there's a lot of benefit in something like phpBB. Aphoxema (talk) 02:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Just went there, very nice, thank you for playing along. ħuman
- Excellent, you write good stuff, no need to cram it into spaces too small to hold it. I hope you know how to create new articles, in general? ħuman
Mmmm...[edit]
I don't think I'm going to contribute to RW anymore. Aphoxema (talk) 23:10, 14 October 2010 (UTC)