User talk:IBelieveinNPOV

Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, IBelieveinNPOV. This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.

Typhoon (talk) 19:05, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

I, however, assume good faith

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, IBelieveinNPOV! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

Gooniepunk (talk) 19:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

@Gooniepunk Thanks for the welcome template, and for AGFing. I didn't know you guys here have an unwelcome template. Anyway, I'm not here to make trouble. I've always liked the logical fallacy and pseudoscience articles, and want to make the whole wiki as impartial and interesting as they are. I guess Gamergate's a bit of a hotspot still; I never really took a position, and I was just trying to edit the article into something which wouldn't be G10'ed for being an attack page on WP. IBelieveinNPOV (talk) 19:15, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

I will tell you this piece of advice, though: RationalWiki, unlike Wikipedia, is not a neutral POV. For more information, please read this article. Thanks, and enjoy your stay at the rhodomontade mouse of the internet! Gooniepunk (talk) 01:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)