User talk:SHahB

Archives for this talk page:

<1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <7>, <8>, < 9>

, (new)

				BOHHHHDAAAAAANNNN!!!!!!

http://duck.fm/file/play/track/28650

Permission

Granted. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן ^{שְׁלֹום}

Thanks. SHahB^{Don't be a fool Or I'll bust you up! Fool! I'm a man with a plan and I'm in command!} 00:38, 13 June 2008 (EDT)

Sure... Samwell. ħuman 00:51, 13 June 2008 (EDT)

Seven. SHahB^{Don't be a fool Or I'll bust you up! Fool! I'm a man with a plan and I'm in command!} 00:51, 13 June 2008 (EDT)

Talk link

I believe you've met this gif before. I'll just let you two get reaquainted. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Make me a bureaucrat!} 00:44, 13 June 2008 (EDT)

I think I'm helping to try...

This isn't a bicyclopedia. This is a Danish anti-Clog forum. Lets work on arguments, not writhing riding. - Shangri'la Ha'bib and her But'tresses.[1] ħuman 21:16, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

I was trying to help...

I accidentally tried to correct the spelling[2] of Yucca Mountain, the first of several things that needed fixing, when I was interrupted by some silly banner reading:

"Your user name or IP address has been blocked.

The block was made by TK. The reason given is (sub)Human Troll/Vandal. Bye.. "

The lead also says the primary season "will end" on June 3, 2008. That needs to be changed to the past tense.

The primary "reporting" also seems to have been abandoned in early April.

McCain and Obama are not the nominees until the conventions. Right now they are both "presumptive" or "certain to be" nominees.

I was only trying to encyclopedicize, not foruminate! ħuman 21:25, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

A little suggestion for future reference

Just so you remember in the future: The correct response to an argument over debated facts on an alleged 'Trustworthy Encyclopedia' is NOT to block the lower-ranking arguers.

But then, CP isn't really Trustworthy OR an Encyclopedia, so I guess it doesn't really matter... --Gulik 11:01, 15 June 2008 (EDT)

Thanks for your opinion. SHahB^{Don't be a fool Or I'll bust you up! Fool! I'm a man with a plan and I'm in command!} 14:07, 15 June 2008 (EDT)

Nevermind, Henry, Terry didn't need your help after all! Aggrieved is already out for two weeks, and Wandering, StatsMsn and AdenJ will be gone soon enough as well. I think the encyclopedia will be substantially improved by this series of actions - just like you proposed. 76.10.153.10 18:06, 15 June 2008 (EDT)

Farvel yourself

If you must leave, at least say goodbye first. Meanie. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Make me a bureaucrat!} 18:16, 15 June 2008 (EDT)

Is he Leaving and never coming back, again? --Gulik

Jerk!

Wasn't me!-caius (tailor) 13:45, 21 June 2008 (EDT)

Below the belt, Shabby. Below the belt. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Make me a bureaucrat!} 13:55, 21 June 2008 (EDT)

Wrong again

Haven't had a sock there in weeks sorry.-caius (tailor) 21:48, 5 July 2008 (EDT)

You Fucking Moron

--Horace 22:23, 6 September 2008 (EDT)

Now now now. Be nice—at least share why he's a fucking moron. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:27, 7 September 2008 (EDT)

Oh, it was my 41st blocking at CP (well, my 41st blocking as Horace). THe straw that broke the camel's back. I snapped. Anyway, he now appears to be examining the circumstances of my original block. Who knows. Maybe I will be welcomed back into the fold. --Horace 23:30, 7 September 2008 (EDT)

That's sounds like quite the record you've built up. On Wikipedia, wouldn't it be permanent block by your dozenth time? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:42, 7 September 2008 (EDT)

I suspect that Horace joined CP multiple times with multiple user names, from multiple IP addresses. But I may be wrong... ħuman 00:13, 8 September 2008 (EDT)

Well, he said "my 41st blocking as Horace" [italics mine], so I figured he meant it was all under the same account. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 00:17, 8 September 2008 (EDT)

Eh, you may be right, but 41 blocks??? That's an achievement that even Trent is jealous of. ħuman 00:35, 8 September 2008 (EDT)

His last block was as Horace41 and this suggests a consistent track record - tho' surely 23A counts as an extra? Генгис^{You have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you.} 03:02, 8 September 2008 (EDT)

Now that I have your attention

Here --Horace 23:28, 7 September 2008 (EDT)

Wrong again (AaronG)

Haven't had a sock in months. Just because the guy's initials are "AG" doesn't mean that he's me. For example I am not, in fact, Alberto Gonzales. Nor would I want to be. yeesh.-caius (tailor) 01:36, 30 September 2008 (EDT)

Incidentally it was my sock that was KenDeMeyer, not Ames. Ace McWicked^{cast ye the first stone} 01:57, 30 September 2008 (EDT)

I'm bored

You should reinstate me at CP. There's no evidence of wrongdoing anyway. But I move IPs, which you would have to deal with. Sterile^rationalize 15:54, 14 November 2008 (EST)

Double-U Tee Eff?

Huh?-caius (tailor) 00:57, 16 November 2008 (EST)

If Bohdan said it, it has to be true. JazzMan 00:58, 16 November 2008 (EST)

I recommend civil disobedience with large scale orchestrated mass door knob licking. tmtoulouse 00:59, 16 November 2008 (EST)

Blasphemer!! JazzMan 01:08, 16 November 2008 (EST)

I guess I can't disagree with that. It's pretty damn funny.... too.... but what I wonder is if someone made a fake account with my name? I've never had an e-mail account like AmesG@ anything .com.-caius (tailor) 00:59, 16 November 2008 (EST)

Nice to see you around again

Hiya there my Danish overlord. ħuman 02:17, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Bohdan here, Bohdan there, Bohdan everywhere

People only keep talking about you and your socks. I'm sick of it; every word about you means one less word about me. So lay it on the table: who are you and why do all these people talk about you? --Idiot number 59 (talk) 05:14, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Bohdan is Bohdan. There is nothing more to be said. --The Emperor _{Kneel before Zod!} 05:20, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Crazy Judy

You write that Judy Wood's "Where Did the Towers Go?" makes scientific sense to you. Here are a few reasons why it does not.

She shows that horrifying image of WTC1 half collapsed and says "See -- it's dustifying before our eyes!" It's been estimated that the mass of sheetrock in the walls alone (i.e. not counting ceilings) was of the order of 1000 tons. That image is exactly what 1000 tons of sheetrock would look like if it was compressed beyond its strength.

She shows the video of a long vertical section of cladding abruptly falling, leaving behind a trail of dust, and says that's conclusive. Well, do you not think that cladding would have accumulated a huge coating of gypsum before it fell? Do you not think the shock of whatever actually made it fall might shake off that dust?

She shows a NYPD car with a badly burned back half but a pristine front half. She says "cars don't burn like that." Well, they do if a fireman comes along with a hose and douses the fire before it spreads.

She asks why there are so many images of partially burned cars with the door handles missing. The answer is very simple -- they melted. Door handles have been made of plastic for a long time now.

She shows that image of a fire truck with the front-projecting ladder bent crazily downwards. She asks "What happened here?" I'd say something fucking heavy (like a section of the tower) fell on it.

She shows another fire truck with an exposed, damaged, front. She asks "What happened to the engine?" The answer is "Nothing, Judy dear. That's not where the engine of a fire truck would be. Time for your nap, I think".

People ask her where exactly the "directed energy weapon" was situated in order to do its destructive work. She does not answer, says "that's not important."

If you want more, read this.

Cheers, --Ithaca (talk) 23:41, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Are you +++Nordic+++?

Are you? I am not the Ombud's man 19:37, 26 September 2016 (UTC)