User talk:Ithaca

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Ithaca!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

--ShadowofLords (talk) 20:30, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Andrea Dworkin[edit]

Good work on making a reprehensible, totally dehumanizing, totally debasing edit, there, son. Listening to Ella Fitzgerald sing "Baby, if I'm the bottom, you're the top" is very different after reading Dan Savage's column..Moderator 00:40, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Well, I see you've reverted. Fine, I won't contest it. Ithaca (talk) 13:51, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
There was also this charming edit. Which is kind of ironic, given the stuff in Mike Bara#Talents.--ZooGuard (talk) 17:24, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Also reverted (extremely rapidly) and I also won't contest. Mike Bara#Talents is primarily about insults, nothing to do with laughable attempts to deny that nude pix are what they seem. Ithaca (talk) 17:39, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
You could have written that particular section in a way that didn't make you come across like a mean-spirited 13-year-old. Listening to Ella Fitzgerald sing "Baby, if I'm the bottom, you're the top" is very different after reading Dan Savage's column..Moderator 17:43, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Hoagland stuff[edit]

Instead of spilling Hoagland all over the place (e.g. in reverse engineering), why don't you concentrate it in his article?--ZooGuard (talk) 10:19, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

RCH is surely the finest possible example of what the RatWiki was created for. I was thinking of embarking on a piece about "hyperdimensional physics," but after your snark I guess I'll drop that. Cheers. Ithaca (talk) 13:42, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I didn't intend that to come out so brusque.
Clarification of what I meant in more words: There are Hoagland-related topics that do deserve separate articles, and some that should be added as examples in existing articles. But it's generally a good idea if those things were covered/summarized in the main article, or at the very least linked in it. That's how wiki articles are supposed to work.--ZooGuard (talk) 14:31, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
All right, I'll look at that. The main RCH article is such a laundry-list anyway, adding to it is too easy. Ithaca (talk) 14:42, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Socialism[edit]

I've moved the discussion on financing entrepreneurship to Talk:Socialism where it will get better exposure. As I see it, the difference is not so much like "The airplane took off. The airplane departed." but rather the difference between a landing and an arrival. While many arrivals are survivable, good landings put less stress on the landing gear, and less stress on the nerves of the instructor in the right-hand seat. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 16:41, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Workers Revolutionary Party[edit]

I noticed you made the edit that inserted Redgrave and Redgrave as the founders of the WRP. Not what I had always understood. Hard to find reputable references on this type of thing, but I am sure that they both joined the party after Gerry Healy renamed the Socialist Labour League as WRP in 1973. Do you specifically know otherwise? --TheroadtoWiganPier (talk) 11:00, 21 July 2015 (UTC)