|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
User talk:Pedobear
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
Welcome to RationalWiki, Pedobear!
Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing:
|
I think. Welcome to the Dollhouse! ħuman
02:38, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
BUTTS BUTTS BUTTS I'm sure.--Tom Moorefiat justitia 02:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Really? What's the problem with "So what's the average age of editors here? I keep reading the Conservapedia talk voting thing."? Really? Wow. Unless there were other contribs that got vaped (we don't do that, do we?) that I haven't seen, why on earth would this user not be welcome? ħuman 02:44, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Huw obviously does not keep up on his "internet memes" as MC would say. Pedobear is a bear this is a pedophile and rapes children. Hence, the comment "What is the average age of RW editors" would imply that he wants to rape us. I presumed that saying that would qualify his as much a candidate for banning as creating a username "iwanttorapeyourchildren". --The Emperor Kneel before Zod! 02:49, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- It's a 4chan meme about pedophilia. You can see it mentioned on Wikipedia (second paragraph). I'd actually support the ban and revert, but at the minimum the pedophile meme is somewhat unwelcome.--Tom Moorefiat justitia 02:51, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- ಠ_ಠ Why so srs?
- Words and terms that once instilled a shock value have been diluted as the years pass. Racist terms that were readily shouted against others during the mid-20th century are now commonly spoken by adolescents as a harmless verbs and nouns.
- Remember the time after 9/11? Nobody spoke ill of it. Now, pundits take light-hearted jabs of the events that transpired. People are more open to snide remarks of 9/11 in such a short amount of time.
- "iwanttorapeyourchildren" is a bit over the top. What if I had created Scat Rat instead? Maybe Watersports Pig? One man's joke is another man's insult. I didn't create this profile to offend anyone, but rather as an innocent joke. I'm not here to rape any children, upload tentacle hentai (Jiburiru Angel is so good! *ahem*), malicious harassment, removal of information, spamming recent changes with call-caps misspellings about how small someone's penis is. I appreciate the opinions on my talk page, and I heartily apologize if my attempted snark isn't tolerated. Pedobear (talk) 04:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough, then. I mean, it's pretty obvious that you're pretending to be a little too naive here, especially given your first question about age, but I guess you can put on whatever act you want. I officially withdraw my unwelcome and replace it with a BUTTS BUTTS BUTTS. But incidentally, no, I don't think jokes about pooping or peeing are as disturbing as pedophile jokes.--Tom Moorefiat justitia 07:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- I guess I'm just not as into pedophilia as you guys. Emperor, I hate to say it, but Marcus is right about you, you are an authoritarian. ħuman 04:22, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- It's a 4chan meme about pedophilia. You can see it mentioned on Wikipedia (second paragraph). I'd actually support the ban and revert, but at the minimum the pedophile meme is somewhat unwelcome.--Tom Moorefiat justitia 02:51, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Huw obviously does not keep up on his "internet memes" as MC would say. Pedobear is a bear this is a pedophile and rapes children. Hence, the comment "What is the average age of RW editors" would imply that he wants to rape us. I presumed that saying that would qualify his as much a candidate for banning as creating a username "iwanttorapeyourchildren". --The Emperor Kneel before Zod! 02:49, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
