User talk:SouthAfrica
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ππ¬ππ±-ππͺππ’π―π¬π― π π¦π€π° (π΄π¬π―π‘π° π¬π£ π΄π¦π°π‘π¬πͺ/ππ π₯π¦π’π³π’πͺπ’π«π±π°) 14:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- thanks for you're kind words. I hope to improve rational wiki during my stay. --SouthAfrica (talk) 08:54, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Coming here with an axe to grind, as it appear you have based on your user name and initial edits, is not a particularly good sign. The reason for this is that it can be harder to see the nuances in a situation. Unless your edits are well referenced, there is a good chance someone else will come along now or in the future with the opposite view and try to revert your edits. I haven't really come to a conclusion about your edits yet, and I'm holding judgment. Bongolian (talk) 00:02, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- I have come here to add information about anti white racism in South Africa. I dont believe I am wrong to do so, as I have used copious sources showing the anti-white stance there. --SouthAfrica (talk) 01:48, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not saying that you're wrong. It would be useful though if you had a reference or references (perhaps a link to the law itself) that showed that the law in question is specifically directed at whites, not large farm owners in general (whom I presume could be other races, even if rarely). This would make a stronger case that it is not not just land reform + political rhetoric, but rather a law that is specifically targeting a race. The parallel at that point would be the Nazi expropriation of Jewish properties, the law for which did specifically identify Jews. Bongolian (talk) 03:03, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- I have come here to add information about anti white racism in South Africa. I dont believe I am wrong to do so, as I have used copious sources showing the anti-white stance there. --SouthAfrica (talk) 01:48, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- Coming here with an axe to grind, as it appear you have based on your user name and initial edits, is not a particularly good sign. The reason for this is that it can be harder to see the nuances in a situation. Unless your edits are well referenced, there is a good chance someone else will come along now or in the future with the opposite view and try to revert your edits. I haven't really come to a conclusion about your edits yet, and I'm holding judgment. Bongolian (talk) 00:02, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
What is going on....entries[edit]
Please stop adding crappy entries on there. ΠaΠ±yΠuigiOΠ½Π€ireπ(T|C) 23:36, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- ^ This ^. The fifth time is not the charm. You have been blocked for 3.6 days. If you continue adding terrible WIGO entries outside of the protected page, you'll receive more blocks. If you do feel that the contrary viewpoint is worth sharing, you better discuss about it first in the talk page. Brietbart, however, is hardly, if never, an acceptable source outside of clogs. --It's-a me, πLeftyGreenMario!π 17:55, 3 June 2018 (UTC)