| Great and terrible|
|On our shelf:|
The Voynich Manuscript is a text generally assumed to have been written in the first half of the 15th century, in a seemingly unknown and curiously repetitive language. Despite the language's statistical similarity to real, known languages, the text has so far defied all attempts at translation or deciphering. The drawings and mathematical figures add an air of intrigue, and the work is often assumed to be some form of religious or pseudo-religious mystical text. Consequently, it has attracted some attention from the wingnut theorists.
The manuscript and its "language"
Scholars of both cryptography and linguistics have found ample interest in studying the text, even if they feel it is a hoax, simply because the process itself presents many questions that become intrinsic to the very notions of "how do you break a code, or crack a new language?"
The plants illustrated in the text have no connection to any real-world plants (with a few exceptions). The mathematical figures do not seem to correspond to any real-world formula or symbolic principle either.
According to Yale University, the current holders of the manuscript, there are 6 conceptual divisions:
- Astronomical and astrological drawings and charts (again, they correspond to nothing we can identify);
- A biological section, including many female nudes with swelled abdomens. The women are bathing in tubs connected by tubes, which look strongly reminiscent of human organs.
- Nine cosmological medallions;
- Pharmaceutical drawings of over 100 different herbs;
- Pages of text, possibly recipes.
Its modern life began in 1912 when it was acquired by a Polish revolutionary turned Anglo-American antiquarian book dealer, Wilfrid Voynich (husband of Ethel Lilian Voynich, author of The Gadfly, etc.), after whom it is now named.
The managers of the Jesuit Villa Mondragone in Frascati sold the manuscript (and a number of others at the same time) to him to help raise money for repairs to the Villa. The Jesuits, in the best mystery novel tradition, appear to have inherited it from Athanasius Kircher S.J. several centuries earlier. Before Kircher, the cookie trail of clues leads back to the Imperial Court of Rudolf II in Prague before the crumbs finally run out, still 150 years or more after its vellum's radiocarbon date. Nearly everything else about its prior history remains largely speculative.
In the 17th century, early owner Georg Baresch concluded that its author must have "acquired some Egyptian treasures of medicine" from a visit "to the oriental regions"; while in the 20th century Wilfrid Voynich concluded that only Roger Bacon could have been its author, and similarly that John Dee must have carried it to Rudolf II's Court.
Not surprisingly, given that it's filled with star charts, exotic unknown plants, and mathematical formulas no one can correlate with any math known today, the "aliens among us" crowd loves this book, suggesting that it is clear evidence aliens not only have been here, but they've been here recently. The Internet Site Above Top Secret has "conclusive evidence" that no one could know how the universe worked in the 1400's. "Flip the pages" and "that spiral looks just like a galaxy arm" (or you know, the arm of any spiral). "Aliens, or a mad genius?" (Minus the "genius", perhaps?)
The "lower half of the internet" seems quite abuzz that this is an alchemical text from some super-secret brotherhood that coded its findings so no one would have record of them. This is actually a decently rational idea of what the text might be, but not to the extent that it possesses any real alchemy secrets.
In 2011, a Finnish businessman named Veikko Latvala claimed to have read the manuscript, not by conventional cryptographic means, but by divine revelation. He claimed it to be a book of prophecy to which he alone was given the key, which sounds much like another book we've heard of before.
- A team at the University of Alberta applied a computer-based system to the Voynich Manuscript's writing. The team's conclusion is that the language used in the Manuscript is most likely Hebrew. With the opening passage "She made recommendations to the priest, man of the house and me and people".
- Another hypothesis was put forward by one Ahmed Aric, who has a hobbyist interest in languages. Working on the idea that the document is written using a dialect of Old Turkish, he and his son claim to have translated as much as 30% of the manuscript as of yet. Sadly, the most "in-depth" source so far is a YouTube video of his, though he has stated that a paper on his ideas was submitted to John Hopkins University.
- After the manuscript was declared "either impossible to solve or else written in gibberish, as an elaborate practical joke", in 2019, a University of Bristol academic seems to have finally cracked the manuscript. "Although the purpose and meaning of the manuscript had eluded scholars for over a century, it took Research Associate Dr. Gerard Cheshire two weeks, using a combination of lateral thinking and ingenuity, to identify the language and writing system of the famously inscrutable document." According to Cheshire
Catthe manuscript was written in a now-extinct proto-Romantic language common to the 1400s, and the part he first translated tells the story of a rescue mission after a 1444 Mediterranean volcanic eruption, as well as monastery women skinny-dipping in hot springs.
Third-party verification of either hypothesis is still pending, with the usual uncertainty implied.
- A 54MB, PDF copy of the manuscript.
- Nick Pelling's research site: contains much information, unlike this page.
- The Crystalinks article lists possible theories as to authorship etc, which partially overlaps with the Wikipedia article.
- The most likely explanation.
- See The Unwashed Masses comments thoughout the 4 pages on Above Top Secret