Difference between revisions of "RationalWiki:Saloon bar"

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 215: Line 215:
  
 
This is a community alert! Do not leave ice cream half made (i.e. after first chill and during stirring) out where a cat, moggy or other feline can get at it: The will appear in the living room with cream on their whiskers and fall asleep, sated. 22:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC) [[File:TerrySmall.png|alt=SusanG|bottom|20px|link=User:SusanG]] [[Image:Toast s.png|alt=Toast|text-bottom|20px|link=User talk:SusanG]]
 
This is a community alert! Do not leave ice cream half made (i.e. after first chill and during stirring) out where a cat, moggy or other feline can get at it: The will appear in the living room with cream on their whiskers and fall asleep, sated. 22:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC) [[File:TerrySmall.png|alt=SusanG|bottom|20px|link=User:SusanG]] [[Image:Toast s.png|alt=Toast|text-bottom|20px|link=User talk:SusanG]]
 +
:Ignore the above post. [[User:Cat|Cat]] ([[User talk:Cat|talk]]) 13:21, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
  
 
== On MC's quiz ==
 
== On MC's quiz ==

Revision as of 13:21, 28 June 2010


Saloon bar
WIGO Bar colour.png

Welcome, BoN
This is a place for general chit-chat about virtually anything that doesn't fit anywhere else.
Invision-Board-France-355.gif For previous conversations, see the automagic barchives.Drinks drunk.gif

What is going on?

(talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic)

Pointless poll

Spicy food, yay or nay?

Spice is nice!

96

Vote

Can't handle heat, must avoid at all costs.

25

Vote

Should Azureality be the site mascot?

Heck yeah!

56

Vote

That thing is so cool, I love it!

3

Vote

Needs more goat

24

Vote

What am I looking at, and whose hairbrained idea was it to make a frickin' Pokémon our mascot?!?

94

Vote

Who is the better rapper?

Tupac Shakur

26

Vote

Biggie Smalls

22

Vote

Both are equally great

24

Vote

MC Goat

57

Vote

To do list

Bartop revamp (sticky)

There's talk of clearing up some of the clutter at the top of this page. See discussion here. ωεαşεζøίɗWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 10:23, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Whooping cough an epidemic in California

I hope it gets to New Jersey and fucks Andy in the asshole. --sloqɯʎs puɐ suƃısuɐɪɹɐssoʎ 21:37, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

This seems to be one of those cases where the spectrum of ideas comes full circle and kisses its own backside. Andy's anti-vaccine campaigning is right-wing nuttery, while in California they seem to be more gullible for new-age pseudo-scientific woo. (Of course, I'd hate to stereotype.)  Lily Inspirate me. 07:10, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, there are anti-vaxxers all across the spectrum. ħumanUser talk:Human 20:50, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
I can say here in Mid-Michigan were getting close to "epidemic" proportions. Morons deciding not to vaccinate is awesome! We had something like 200(+) cases in the last year, and 2 years ago we had 2 cases. (I'm speaking of the Flint, MI area) Quaru (talk) 12:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

National (education) standards.

In my neck of the woods there is a minor controversy raging regarding proposed national standards for primary schools. As I understand it, the proposal is to have the kids from ages 5-12 all assessed for basic literacy and math skills so as to provide information to parents on how the school they are attending is performing compared to other schools in the area. It will also help to determine problems with individuals that may not be picked up otherwise and to provide some insight into problems in particular cultural and socio economic areas. To me it sounds like a wonderful idea, a no-brainer as it were, but the level of opposition from shools and left of centre political parties is enormous. Apparently the head of primary schools in Auckland has recommended that all of his schools boycott the whole process and the ministry of education seems powerless to do much about it. After following the debate in the media I must confess to be basically ignorant as to the reason for the outrage. As far as I can tell, no-one has offered a cogent reason for not adopting the system. Can any of you offer any reasons why the introduction of national standards would not be a mistake? --DamoHi 20:46, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

They dunnit here (UK) & it went berserk: tests at all ages & schools fighting for ratings. No allowances made for e.g. one school beng heavily immigrant with another being middle class. There's also the "being taught - not to learn - but to pass tests" aspect. Pressure on teachers and pupils gone mad (not that I've any special love of teachers) 20:52, 25 June 2010 (UTC) SusanG Toast
The British Government places great importance on the need to assess and test pupils in order to know what they have achieved. Compulsory testing takes place at the ages of seven, eleven and fourteen in England and Scotland (but not Wales where more informal methods of assessment are favoured).

All children in state schools are tested in English and mathematics at the ages of seven, 11 and 14, and pupils aged 11 and 14 are also tested in science.

Most young people take GCSE (General Certificate of Secondary Education) examinations at sixteen, and many take vocational qualifications, A/S and A levels (Advanced levels), at seventeen and eighteen.
From t'web. See also: this. 20:57, 25 June 2010 (UTC) SusanG Toast
I accept that there may be issues with "teaching to the test" although I suspect that such a phenomenon is likely to be much more common in high school where the results are important to the students. Under this proposal it is really the schools that are being tested, not the students. I think part of the idea is to discover potential areas of concern within areas so they can be corrected, therefore a school that is full of immigrants will score lower than other schools and so will obtain higher resources to deal with the shortfall. As I understand it, the proposal does not link funding to good results, rather it will indicate where more funding is required. In any case, many parents have a choice of 2 or 3 schools in their area (presumably all with similar socio economic status) and so having a guide to determine which school is better must be a good idea. Let marketplace pressures force backward schools to improve (or something like that anyway). DamoHi 07:23, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
In the UK the children's results were used to rank schools, this then meant that parents tried to get their children into those schools which were though to be better, going so far as to move house or even lie about their home address. As children whose parents take a greater interest in their kids' education tend to do better this leads to greater disparity between "good" and "bad" schools. Faith schools often had good track records so many parents would be obliged to go to church solely to get their kids into the better ranking school. Some schools were then left with the dregs and seen as underperforming with the teachers catching the flak.  Lily Inspirate me. 10:42, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
It had surprising effects: house prices inside a "good school's" catchment area rose disproportionately. The "teaching to the test" effect was apparently more pronounced in lower (up to 11 y.o.) schools. The difference being that exams had always been a feature of secondary (high) schools. 11:08, 26 June 2010 (UTC) SusanG Toast

Atheism and the World Cup

I want to take a look at Andy's "hypothesis" that atheism leads to World Cup losses, though to do this I need to know what constitutes an atheist country in Andy's mind. We know England is one (one which Andy has already written off as a failure because they tied the US, though they still made it through the first round). Is the Netherlands? They seem to be doing quite well. France and Italy (knocked out of the game now) are generally seen as quite Catholic, but they're part of that socialist EU, so perhaps they really are atheist? I just know Andy is going to change the parameters to align with what he already thinks (when the US is defeated, he'll blame Obama), but I'd like to see how this plays out. As I see it we have:

North America:
USA: God's chosen country - advancing to next round
Mexico: Catholic - advancing to next round
Honduras: Catholic, but bordering Nicaragua, so commie through diffusion - not advancing
South America - All Catholic, all advancing (uncliched by Chile so far, due to the loss of Pinochet)
Europe:
Denmark: atheist - not advancing
England: atheist - advancing, but underperforming
Germany: atheist if they lose, Christian if they win - advancing, too early to call their actual religious views though
France: socialist - not advancing
Spain: Catholic, if they make it, socialist if they don't (with a score of 2-1, they're looking pretty Catholic) Catholic - advancing
Portugal: See Spain Catholic - advancing
Switzerland: atheist, especially if they don't win
Greece: socialist, not advancing
Serbia: part of that mess in the Balkans, hard to pigeonhole - not advancing
Slovakia: Christian - advancing
Slovenia: must be somewhat atheistic, not advancing
Africa: all only here because of affirmative action - only one advancing (proving affirmative action is bad); Ghana, he advancing country, is predominantly Christian
Asia/Oceania:
North Korea: atheist - lost badly
South Korea: Christian/Buddhist - advancing
Japan: theist - advancing, but not Christian, so they won't get much farther
Australia: atheist - not advancing
New Zealand: atheist - not advancing (but performing "credibly", according to atheists)

So it looks like Christians win and atheist lose, unless they don't and it's liberals' fault. DickTurpis (talk) 21:10, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm, some of these stats are dated already. Got distracted in the writing of this, and all the games seem to be over now. DickTurpis (talk) 21:11, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Japan did advance, they'll be facing Catholic Paraguay in the round of 16. Unfortunately, Switzerland did not, despite the fact that it's rather conservative compared to European atheist/commie standards. Röstigraben (talk) 21:18, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Can't be atheist then. I'll have to make adjustments. DickTurpis (talk) 21:31, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Hmm, so the only country left that couldn't possibly be relabeled as Christian is Japan - guess I'll be rooting for them. Banzai! Röstigraben (talk) 21:36, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
And England. Andy is too heavily invested in their atheism to suddenly reverse and call them Anglican or something. DickTurpis (talk) 21:38, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Addendum: Notable absences

Countries/regions that did not even make the cut:
China: atheistic
Middle East: Muslim
Russia: atheist
Canada: socialist
Scandinavia (sans Denmark): socialist/atheist
Venezuela: commie
Cuba: commie
Kenya: Muslim (disregarding the Christian majority; the world's most famous Muslim was born there)
India: polytheistic mumbo-jumbo; might as well be atheist
Further proof that Christians are better at everything. DickTurpis (talk) 21:44, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

The official Turpis Andy-o-Meter predicts the next round

Uruguay/South Korea: Uruguay. More Christian (though the rise of Christianity in South Korea will make the game close, and in 4 years they will do even better); odds 7/5
US/Ghana: US, obviously; odds 99/1
Netherlands/Slovakia: Slovakia, less atheism; odds 2/1
Brazil/Chile: Brazil, unless Pinochet returns, in which case Chile; odds 2/1
Argentina/Mexico: Argentina: there are few Mexicans left in the country as they have mostly illegally emigrated; odds 3/1
Germany/England: this game will certainly be atheistic England's Waterloo; odds 20/1
Paraguay/Japan: the Catholic Paraguay will win; odds 10/1
Spain/Portugal: Trick question, "Portugal" is just another word for Spain
Place your bets. DickTurpis (talk) 22:10, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Shouldn't this really be either at forum:sport or talk wigo CP? ħumanUser talk:Human 03:57, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Probably.


If you're a VENUE FASCIST!!!!! DickTurpis (talk) 10:11, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Seriously, though, I think I thought I might have been in WiGO CP talk when I wrote this. I get lost sometimes. DickTurpis (talk) 10:19, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Ghana 2 USA 1 in extra time. How much extra time do they play? ħumanUser talk:Human 20:29, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

No idea here. I'm ignorant about this sporty thing in general. But if things stay as they are the Andy-o-meter seems to need calibration. Wait, did Obama perhaps call the team and wish them good luck right before the game, completely demoralizing them? That must be it. No team could recover from something like that. DickTurpis (talk) 20:35, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

The psychic octapus says that Germany will win, if that's of any help. Sen (talk) 20:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm with the octopus, here's keeping my fingers crossed for a penalty shootout. Well, off to watch the game now! Röstigraben (talk) 12:27, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
I'd like to point out that the octopus was right. WHERE IS YOUR ATHEIST GOD NOW??? Sen (talk) 20:23, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Breaking news

I hate soccer, but the US was just eliminated from the World Cup by Ghana. The Spikey Punk I'm punking my punk! 21:11, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Lame. I was hoping going against Ghana would give us better odds. And it probably did. In other news, we're now an Atheist Nation, yes? Quaru (talk) 21:20, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Make me a sysop?

A sysop can hardly do any more damage than a bunchanumbers, and the "rights" can be taken away again the moment he tries anything hinky or starts trolling users who don't want to be trolled. Maybe it'll do us good to have an anti-'crat around here. To use a football comentators cliche, it keeps us honest. Bondurant (talk) 18:23, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Uh, we tried that before and then he went on a deletion spree. Why the fuck on Earth should we try again? Isn't insanity doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results? Gooniepunk2010 Oi! Oi! Oi! 18:33, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
I apologise forbeing such a twat. FUCK SHIT CUNT PISS - 86.40.ei.π (talk)
Oh for Gods sake Goonie. Although this will be deleted, as every time I tell the truth about this it gets reverted and hidden, you know as well as I do that the deletion spree was not malicious in any fucking way, so stop perpetuating that lie. I knew I was going to lose my sysop powers at that stage, so it was one great last hurrah. Don't ignore the context, it makes you look like the idiot you are. 86.40.106.164 (talk) 19:13, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

RationalWiki Boredom Project

I have read all of mainspace. o_0 And much of Conservapedia: space. Essay: space was a waste of my brain. I would only approach Fun: space with a large axe.

There's quite a bit of the Annotated Bible still in need of annotation.

So. If you're terminally fucking bored and feel like breaking Human's wiki ... - David Gerard (talk) 17:05, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure what's worse, 200 hours of porn or... :D --Alienfromspace (talk) 18:08, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Work on the annotated Bible = interesting reading. 200 hours of porn = very sore nuts and possibility of friction burns. ConcernedResident omg ponies!!! 20:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Now you can work your way through 1600 SMBC comics! Scarlet A.pngsshole 23:27, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Hover

When you hover over a page link (I suspect you need a gadget to see it) the title & first line appears in the hover box. Over mine (at least to me) there's also a piccy :File:TerrySmall.png. Where does the wikistuff get the info for the piccy? Also, hovering over Saloon Bar gives a rather unlovely picture of a smiley squeezing a tube of toothpaste File:Wank.gif, why? 20:50, 26 June 2010 (UTC) SusanG Toast

Must be your browser, mine does neither. ħumanUser talk:Human 22:49, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Your browser is prefetching everything in links. This is supposed to make your web experience quicker, ie any link you may want to click is already in your cache. In some ways that was a good idea in the days of dial-up, but browsing wiki-type pages with possibly hundreds of links it just fills your cache up and possibly collects cookies from external sites too. It's fairly easy to turn off in most sensible browsers. 82.23.208.15 (talk) 04:03, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Xtianity founded science

Oh no it didn't| 22:21, 26 June 2010 (UTC) SusanG Toast

Surely this is a better link.  Lily Inspirate me. 08:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Much better, but I liked the graph being the first thing you see rather than waaaaay down. 15:03, 27 June 2010 (UTC) SusanG Toast
Following a few links I discovered this good commentary on a Catholic writer who tried to rebut the original (admittedly flawed) version of the article. I'm not an expert on these matters but it would have been enlightening to see what was changed. Maybe we should try something similar here.  Lily Inspirate me. 09:43, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Excellent: Half way through reading it. 10:02, 28 June 2010 (UTC) SusanG Toast

Tornados and floods

So I was at an outdoor event earlier this evening, and it started pouring rain a few hours after we arrived. Within minutes, storms rolled in and we were all caught outside (in my case, about a mile walk from my car) with severe thunderstorms. I finally got in my car with my friends and drove back to their house. About 10 minutes after arriving, we were listening to the radio and they issued a tornado warning for their area just west of us, with the tornado on the ground heading southeast. Undetered, as I was heading north west, just around the storm, I get on the freeway and hear that, one by one, the highways around me were being closed for flooding. Thankfully, I got far enough to where I could use the side streets after a few minutes, but even those had flashflooding to the point where I could visably see the water on the streets rising. After about an hour, I finally arrived home, but let's just say that the drive from the event to my friends' house and then back home was one of the most nerve-racking experiences I've had to date. The Spikey Punk I'm punking my punk! 05:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

A couple of years ago I was having lunch with a group friends in the country on a hot summer day. To keep cool we dined indoors - it was fortunate that we did as out of the blue a big thunderstorm brewed up and chucked it down in buckets. It was only after about 45 minutes of torrential rain that on of the blokes suddenly realised "Shit, I've left my sun-roof open". Oh what laugh we all had about it.  Lily Inspirate me. 07:55, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
I made the same mistake last week. Not sunroof, but windows, and rain blew in from everywhere. ħumanUser talk:Human 08:02, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

The power of prayer!

When England were 2-0 down, the commentators noted that Fabio seemed to be praying and perhaps that was all that could save us now. Then we got our goal, and our other kinda-sorta goal. Maybe there's something to this atheistic = sucking theory :D --JeevesMkII The gentleman's gentleman at the other site 14:58, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Well, it's not implausible that thinking that you have god on your side would make you more confident and hence play better. Cubic wisest Hoover! 14:59, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Is there a footy match on? 15:02, 27 June 2010 (UTC) SusanG Toast
You poser! I know you're watching. --JeevesMkII The gentleman's gentleman at the other site 15:04, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
No! On my honour as a devout anti-sportite, Yer Honour! I didn't know what time it was on & went walkies, got back too early obviously. 15:07, 27 June 2010 (UTC) SusanG Toast
Germany are clearly just slightly less atheistic than England. X Stickman (talk) 15:36, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Another bit of commentary, "The german fans are crying "Ole!" on every pass." Curse you, Conservapedia, and what you've done to my brain. --JeevesMkII The gentleman's gentleman at the other site 15:50, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Damn, that match was epic. I was hoping I'd be able to brag about our superior atheismo afterwards, but the referee being suddenly struck with blindness when Lampard's shot bounced off into the net actually supports Andy's hypothesis of divine intervention in the World Cup. Anyway, here's to the best match of the competition so far! Röstigraben (talk) 17:04, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

4th July

Over in the UK we really know how to mark the day! 18:00, 27 June 2010 (UTC) SusanG Toast

I thought you celebrated it as "the day we got rid of the damn Yanks." MDB (talk) 12:45, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
"The day we got rid of the damn Yanks", reminds me of that episode of The Simpsons about the lemon tree, with the old man at the end in Shelbyville proclaiming that they chased the lemon tree out of town because it was haunted. - π 13:00, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Remember Wembley!

The Wembley-curse is still working!

Apologize, England, and you might win a game against Germany again!

sincerely,

A very drunk Gmb (talk) 18:13, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

I take it England lost? Who were they playing? 19:07, 27 June 2010 (UTC) SusanG Toast
Germany, in the first decent game of this disappointing world cup Gmb (talk) 19:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

US Health care

US is BOTTOM of the league see here and here. (The Commonwealth fund is US (New York) based.) Hat tip 20:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC) SusanG Toast

I saw this in the Indie earlier in the week and thought about posting it here. But then I looked up the Commonwealth Fund and saw that it is hardly non-partisan on the issue of health care reform, much as I believe their results. Bondurant (talk) 21:20, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Their figures are from independent sources though (?). 21:31, 27 June 2010 (UTC) SusanG Toast

Cats & Ice Cream

This is a community alert! Do not leave ice cream half made (i.e. after first chill and during stirring) out where a cat, moggy or other feline can get at it: The will appear in the living room with cream on their whiskers and fall asleep, sated. 22:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC) SusanG Toast

Ignore the above post. Cat (talk) 13:21, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

On MC's quiz

I am a Tetronian. This was a lot of effort just to troll. I think he deserves a round of applause. - π 23:33, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

What kind of idiotic loser makes something like this to bash a website? Oh wait, I seem to have forgotten whom we are talking about. The Goonie 1 What's this button do? Uh oh.... 23:36, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Glasshouse. - π 01:15, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Bahahaha what an epic and unmitigated failure! Gave me a hell of a laugh though! It just fails so badly. Acei9 23:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Seriously, though, what kind of pathetic dolt is that fucking obsessed with our website? How much of a loser do you have to be? He, just now, made himself look even more like the virgin, zit-faced Trekkie we all know he is. Absolutely pathetic. Lord of the Goons The official spikey-haired skeptical punk 23:43, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
I think this is probably the best thing Marcus has ever done. Not that it's a terribly high bar to clear. DickTurpis (talk) 23:46, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey, when you're as much of a loser as he is, you can only go up, right? Punky Your mental puke relief 23:51, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Troll. Waving arms. Don't feed it. ĴάΛäšςǍ₰ whats up? 00:04, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
I have tried several times to get Ace McWicked but can't. Perhaps I haven't been added. Acei9 00:31, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, I've been trying to get AKjeldsen all day. What gives? DickTurpis (talk) 00:37, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Funny thing is, I tried to score and MC, and all I got was a Human. Oh well. AnarchoGoon Swatting Assflys is how I earn my living 00:39, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Excellent! I signed in as anonymous, only two questions' answers really reflected my opinion, and yet I still wound up as... Human! ħumanUser talk:Human 01:09, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
The six possible results are listed below the verdict at the end. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:12, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
(EC)Ace isn't a result. You can only be Tentronian, Goonie, Human, Susan, Nx/RA, and David Gerard. I think you get Susan if you answer yes to hating religious people regardless of the other questions. The test needs a lot of work, for starts that is not a very good cross section of the editors here a lot of them have very similar attitudes to trolling. Also the sample questions on deal with things MC cares about; how they react to trolling, stance on religion, whether they like templates or not. There are definitely far more issues that would distinguish between even those six, never mind other people. Suggestions to help him improve? - π 01:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm SusanG.. I still don't know what a 'MC' is...Quaru (talk) 02:27, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Major Cunt. BTW, Tentronian--Thanatos (talk) 02:28, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm a SusanG. Yeah, I hate religious people. Senator Harrison (talk) 03:04, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm kind of insulted. I answered truthfully and kept getting Tetronian. (And why do I get lumped with Nx? I invented ruining this wiki.) Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 05:32, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Hmm, I thought that I'd end up as a SusanG (Morons!) but got RaNx. Of course the quiz reveals more about the setter than any who bothered to answer the questions. I'm disappointed that there wasn't a MarcusCicero in the results, it would have been interesting to see how he identifies himself because it was rather boring and stereotyped.  Lily Inspirate me. 06:08, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
RA/Nx as well, even though I selected the (first) anti-religion answer. I'd better learn how to make templates. Röstigraben (talk) 06:10, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Would you like me to upload a pie chart of the results? 86.40.216.170 (talk) 09:51, 28 June 2010 (UTC)By the way, if you answered in question 1, 'make an emotive appeal for calm' and combined this with the last question 'I just wish people were nice' then you end up as Tetronian'. To be Susan you need to combine the 'leaving and never coming back' card with 'religious people are morons'. For Human you need to play the 'pick up your sword and fight for what is right' and when asked 'does this site need more rules' you say less rules. Gerard is when you 'revert and block' and require more rules. 86.40.216.170 (talk) 09:56, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Not really. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 09:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Crundy - you are too insignificant and hysterical to be an option on this quiz. 86.40.216.170 (talk) 09:56, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Well that's my life in ruins. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 09:57, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Totally accurate to +n degree
Acei9 09:58, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Tetronian. Why aren't I am option? EddyP (talk) 10:00, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Seems I'm a Humming too. Who knew. At least I know there isn't a Psy on his list. I'm too nice... and insignificant. *sniff* --PsyGremlinKhuluma! 10:06, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
The quiz says I'm a "power top." SJ Debaser 10:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Every time I try and fill the quiz in it tries to stick its thumb up my arse. I guess MC left some personal code in there somewhere. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 10:15, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

BBBBBBIIIIIIIIIZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ BBBBBBIIIIIIIIIZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ BBBBBBIIIIIIIIIZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ BBBBBBIIIIIIIIIZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

BBBBBBIIIIIIIIIZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ BBBBBBIIIIIIIIIZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ BBBBBBIIIIIIIIIZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Hitler rants about Vuvuzelas at the World Cup. BIZZZZZZZZ. ĴαʊΆʃÇä₰ is writing a comment 01:33, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

o===========<()♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪ P-Foster (talk) 02:44, 28 June 2010 (UTC)


As a Sauff Effriken I just want to say that the only thing worse that the refereeing at WC2010 is the vuvuzela. I'm tired of being deafened at the games. --PsyGremlinPraat! 09:18, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

It GAWZILLRAH!!!

I got a set of Ultraman dvds. Is the original series from the sixties (dub done by the cast of speed racer) any good?--Thanatos (talk) 02:03, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Of course it isn't. That's why you watch it! --Kels (talk) 02:44, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

NJ Recall site

AFAIK, still nothing on the court decision. They're setting up a new website though; in the meantime, have a look at what happened to the old one. EddyP (talk) 10:24, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

I have grab a picture for the memories. - π 10:27, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

England jokes

Post below this line:


What have Frank Lampard's goal and the Nazi regime got in common?
If you're German, they both never happened. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 11:30, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Substituting Defoe for Heskey when you need goals?
That's like switching off the porn when you fancy a wank. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 11:34, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Don't forget all the hilarious Facebook ones people are joining now.
"England are guna win the world cup, LOL jk, they're shit."
"Maybe, Just Maybe! LOL JK."
"I can tell when the balls over the line!! LOL, jk I'm a Uruguayan linesman" SJ Debaser 11:54, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Stupid facebook.
No wonder Rooney's been scoring in training, as Capello claims. He's been playing against England's defence. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 12:02, 28 June 2010 (UTC)