Conservapedia talk:Conservative

This article contains information about one or more living persons. Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats. Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed. If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Archives for this talk page:

<1>

, (new)

Is Ken a true conservative? I have my doubts.

I am far from an expert on the political spectrum and conservatism seems to have different meanings around the world, but the one issue that always seems universal is economics. On this issue Ken seems to be rather left wing. He seems to take joy at free economies struggling, and has expressed joy at the rise in Christianity as economies struggle. To paraphrase, the recent downturn in the worldwide economy is a good thing because it turns people to God. This in my mind makes him not a conservative at all, merely a fundamentalist who takes joy in other peoples suffering. --Mercian (talk) 04:15, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Putting back the Awards Section

I put back the Awards section to the article on Ken because other Major Conservapedian has their awards showing. Andy has his awards. Ed Poor has his awards. So I think we should keep Ken's awards section up.--S.H. DeLong (talk) 04:04, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm butthurt

Ken dropped me from his Christmas card list any nobody noticed. nobs 06:14, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

I noticed. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 14:08, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Actually, I been sulking over it for a month, trying figure how I offended the guy and why he'd wish a bunch on godless atheists sockpuppets Merry Christmas and leave me in lurch.nobs 14:41, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Oh pumpkin, I know... One day, he'll be sorry for mistreating you. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 14:46, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

== Shockofgod=Ken

??? ==

Hi all,

I think that Ken

and Shock might be the same person. The reason why I think this is because:

• They both assert (without any proof, of course) that there is a link in between atheism and obesity.

• They both use childlike tactics when “debating” atheists, and they both have a similar style of censoring the opponent when it pleases them and then claiming victory.

• They both frequently refer to each other and their works.

• . Shock takes it personally when Conservative is insulted or called a “troll”, as if he were the one being insulted... hmm...

BP9^{Prototype lab} 14:43, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

I need to ask the experts something

I made a account there and Ken immediately littered the talk page with his Atheist hate-boner. I kinda did poke a pole at him, but he kept saying about how "multiple people" run the account. Is that true or is he making bullshit up? Rockford the Roe ^{boop my snoot}_{praise Oscar Wilde} 13:35, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

I called him out on his referring to himself as "one of the users of the Conservative account" when he was here as User:GiuocoPiano. He then said something that I believe to be true. He gave his password to two other people. One wasn't interested and never edited. One of them probably did edit at least once. Ken used to keep going on about one page created by the Conservative account having references done completely differently from his usual pages. That one page he kept pointing to was probably created by Ken's friend. So basically Conservative is a one-man-show and the idea of the Conservative account being used by multiple people is just more of Ken's wishful thinking and another one of hid ideas for crushing world atheism that never came to anything. Spud (talk) 13:56, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

This sounds about right. As tortured as his reasoning and logic can be, I've always found he'll go to considerable lengths to avoid telling an outright lie about himself. I suspect this was the primary motivation in the password sharing / multiple user gambit: he desperately wanted a rejoinder to the periodic bouts of "Lol, ur KDM, internet famous creationist moron!", and it allowed him to "argue" that, because the Conservative account is not (necessarily) the (sole) work of KDM, no-one can ever know his true identity for certain. (?!)

Bonus lulz: A Portrait of the Creationist as a Young Ken. He's been at this for a long, long time. Helena Bonham Carter (talk) 16:24, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Mental sharpener edits

One edit is removing Ken's full name, claiming it's self-evident. Er, just leave it alone, the reference isn't going to change anything. Another edit is a collapse complaining that it's too much space. Collapse isn't the way to go, though; we should be splitting the list into two columns. Another edit is just removing a joke you personally don't like, but it's not THAT terrible of a joke. The only edits that maybe should remain are minor spelling/formatting fixes (though mixing in that lie template... why?). So, yeah I reverted it. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 22:32, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

ok I'll fix the list Mental sharpener (talk) 22:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

That didn't address the rest of why I reverted your edits. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 22:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)