There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
| Putting the psycho in|
|Men who stare at goats|
|By the powers of tinfoil|
| Style over substance|
Not to be confused with the actual medical condition of sound sensitivity (Hyperacusis)
“”Electromagnetic hypersensitivity disorder — people who believe they have sensitivity to electronic devices claim that electronic signals from WiFi, cellphones and even television can cause them to experience headaches, fatigue and even heart palpitations. […] The symptoms you experience with electromagnetic hypersensitivity are identical to the symptoms of anxiety and stress. […] Over 46 studies were reviewed in 2009 in the Journal of Bioelectromagnetics, and they found that people who were exposed to electromagnetic signals were unable to determine when the devices were turned on or off. Bad hypothesis — should've used Occam's Razor.
|—Maddox, How to tell if you believe in bullshit|
Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (ES for short) is a self-diagnosed "medical condition" caused by a supposed "sensitivity" to the harmless radiation emitted by all electronical devices. The symptoms are in reality not a result of the "disorder" but of the nocebo effect.
ES is claimed by believers to present itself either directly in the
crank "patient" as some unspecific form of nausea or tingling (or some other vague fever symptom), or — more asymptomatically — as an alleged long-term cancer hazard.
This despite the fact that the electromagnetic radiation in question is exclusively non-ionizing (read: unable to cause cancer), nor able to cause physical discomfort or stress.
ES is surrounded by the usual hysteria founded on an inability to understand that radiation spans a spectrum from the harmless (domestic electrical power), through the benign (infra-red), through the not-so-benign (ultra-violet or UV), all the way up to the downright scary (gamma).
While some forms of electromagnetic radiation do cause sickness (e.g. UV from the Sun causes sunburn, and potentially skin cancer), this "medical" condition is only related to modern electronics, such as power lines or wireless devices. Incidents include:
- Early studies made claims that power lines and other electromagnetic radiation doubled the rate of leukemia. However, this was not confirmed under proper analysis.
- A man named Per Segerbäck claimed to suffer from electromagnetic sensitivity from cell phones. Phones that are making a call, receiving a call, or searching for a signal supposedly trigger the sensitivity, while an idle phone does not.
- Cell phones are generally claimed to increase the chance of brain tumors. However, no link was discovered. Cell phones may still cause other health issues, most commonly hearing loss as some individuals find the need to yell in their phone to communicate.
- A cell phone tower was erected on August 12, 2009 in the Fourways Memorial Park in Craigavon, South Africa. Residents of Craigavon complained about radiation from the tower causing headaches, rashes and other issues, despite the tower being turned off during the time the alleged symptoms took place. The residents still wanted to get the tower removed, citing environmental concerns and public participation issues.
The not at all loony "Citizens for Safe Technology" tried to get a court ruling preventing the use of incredibly dangerous wireless smart meters in British Columbia, Canada. They lost. And lost on appeal. But apparently they are still working on a class action suit for the damage caused by something they can't detect and for which there is absolutely no credible evidence. Apparently they demand the right to live as they please, though for some reason they have not yet spotted that there is no law forcing them to have electricity in their homes.
They should all be dead
The ultimate problem with the argument for electromagnetic hypersensitivity as an actual illness is that if it were an actual condition, people suffering from the condition would have died long ago, or be in constant pain. The civilized parts of the world are blanketed with electromagnetic signals from radio and satellite signal transmissions. Between AM/FM broadcasts, ham radio transmissions, C-, Ka- and Ku-band transmissions for television and satellite internet signal, GSM and CDMA cellular transmissions, GPS signals and any manner of private or government signals, most of them significantly stronger than the signals produced by individual cell phones or WiFi endpoints, people with electromagnetic hypersensitivity would be unable to leave their own yards, let alone their own houses, without writhing in hideous agony.
Then there is the curious fact that many people claiming to suffer from electromagnetic hypersensitivity underwent diagnostic MRI procedures without any problems. In other words, they claim that electromagnetic fields in the milliwatt range cause all sorts of symptoms, yet at the same time they appear to be totally insensitive to electromagnetic pulses in the kilowatt range from an MRI device.
Additionally, electrical devices in general, including DC devices such as flashlights and kids' toys and AC devices that plug straight into the wall, and even the wiring in the walls, give off electromagnetic radiation, no matter how strong the shielding on the cables might be.
The proper treatment for radiation is to live isolated from society, become Amish, building a Faraday cage within your house, wearing a tinfoil hat, or a combination of these treatments. However, the cheapest option is to be a normal person, and visit a doctor to find out what's actually causing your symptoms.
Some people say that when tested those claiming electromagnetic hypersensitivity are unable to tell whether the evil device is actually transmitting or not. This is
funny (a) mischievous and (b) entirely true.
In a nutshell
|Your Cell Phone Won't Give You Cancer (Healthcare Triage)|
|Do Cell Phones Cause Cancer? (SciShow)|
|Do Cell Phones Cause Brain Tumors? (Veritasium)|
- Rhoda Zione Alale
- American Academy of Environmental Medicine
- Mehmet Oz - That quack was pushing cell phone cases that block the signals to your brain to avoid brain cancer. Never mind the fact phones don't emit ionizing radiation.
- ElectroSensitivity UK, "to help those who have become sensitive"
- Prove-It, who wants a moratorium on all new public wireless technologies until they're "proven" to cause no harm
- Best EMF Health, run by someone who claims EMF gave them six different cancers, and who now hawks "LifeWave patches".
- As in: unrecognized-by modern, evidence-based medicine as a physical illness. It is recognized by psychiatry as a form of delusion, however.
- In all modern electronics, the radiation used is the non-ionizing radio frequency radiation, rather than the ionizing alpha, beta and gamma particles emitted from radioactive isotopes.
- Massive revelation in iBurst tower battle
- The crank science behind "electro sensitivity" Among The Truthers, Jonathan Kay
- Citizens for Safe Technology (except for devices which emit microwave and WiFi signals, which are provably safe but not "Safe™")
- Smart meters are about as dangerous as … The Conversation
- Group seeks smart meter ban, Vernon Morning Star, 30 March 2012
- British Columbia Utilities Commission
- B.C.'s high court unplugs smart meter appeal, Surrey Leader, 14 November 2012
- Citizens for Safe™ Technology
- Citizens For Safe Technology Is One Step Closer To Filing A Class Action Lawsuit About Smart Meters, Canadian Awareness Network (tinfoil hat required, this is a health fooldom site).