RationalWiki's 2018 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3383Goal: $5000


From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Gather 'round the campfire
Icon folklore.svg
Urban legends

Folklore is the broad mass of myths, legends, stories and superstitions that built up over the centuries among local communities. Most folklore is harmless entertainment, perhaps with a dash of moralising, but has streaks of nastiness in odd corners, such as antisemitism, nationalism and other barriers to mutual understanding. Folklore has two descendant forms: herbalism takes much of its material from folk remedies, most of which are either untested scientifically, or disproved (and some are bloody dangerous).

The folk process[edit]

Urban legends are folklore's modernised makeover, or rather, continuation. The repetition, adaptation, and transmission of folklore defines a process known as the "folk process", a process that is generally defined by three factors:

  1. Continuity, the preservation of the original material, which links the present with the past;
  2. Variation, which springs from the creative impulse of individuals or groups using the folklore material; and
  3. Selection by the community, which determines the form or forms that are preserved for transmission to the next generation.[1]

These factors give folklore its enduring qualities and adaptability. New words are written for old songs. Old cautionary tales are recycled and turned against new boogeymen.

As such, various technologies have impacted the transmission of folklore, but have not really changed the nature of the underlying folk process. Technologies such as the telephone, the telecopier, and the Internet have made it easier to transmit folklore narratives, songs, and images. Digital media have expanded the variety of material the folk process can work on, made the popular culture of distant peoples available for cultural appropriation elsewhere, and make the copyrighted creations of commercial publishers a potential subject for the folk process as well.[2] But there is no difference between the material transmitted by these methods and traditional folklore, unless folklore is defined as something that can only be transmitted through a purely oral tradition.

The new science or pseudoscience of "memetics" is an attempt to re-invent the wheel here, by attaching biological and evolutionary metaphors to the folk process.[3]

See also[edit]


  1. Yates, Mike (February 25, 2002). "Matters of Texture, Function and Context". Musical Traditions. http://www.mustrad.org.uk/enth30.htm. Retrieved January 20, 2012. 
  2. Who put the goat in there? The yellow goat I ate?
  3. See, Kenneth D. Pimple, "The Meme-ing of Folklore.", Journal of Folklore Research. 33:3 (Fall 1996), pp. 236-240.