|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈/Do 9/11 Truthers Have Valid Arguments?
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈/Do 9/11 Truthers Have Valid Arguments? | Result: ?[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Empty. Misnamed? Duplicative of 9/11? Bongolian (talk) 05:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Are we allowed to delete a user's sandbox article?--Owlman (talk) 05:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Only if there's some reason it's so obnoxious we shouldn't even have it on the site. No reason to zap a WIP that would go fine in Essay: space - David Gerard (talk) 15:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- You cannot be serious. 𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈 (talk) 15:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- There, I didn't remember it was still around. XD 𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈 (talk) 16:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- You cannot be serious. 𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈 (talk) 15:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Only if there's some reason it's so obnoxious we shouldn't even have it on the site. No reason to zap a WIP that would go fine in Essay: space - David Gerard (talk) 15:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Are we allowed to delete a user's sandbox article?--Owlman (talk) 05:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- It's userspace. Fuzzy. Cat. Potato! (talk/stalk) 15:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Userspace doesn't need AfDing in most cases.Keter (talk) 16:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)