RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈/Do 9/11 Truthers Have Valid Arguments?

𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈/Do 9/11 Truthers Have Valid Arguments? | Result: ?

User:𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈/Do 9/11 Truthers Have Valid Arguments? (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. Empty. Misnamed? Duplicative of 9/11? Bongolian (talk) 05:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

   Are we allowed to delete a user's sandbox article?--Owlman (talk) 05:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

   Only if there's some reason it's so obnoxious we shouldn't even have it on the site. No reason to zap a WIP that would go fine in Essay: space - David Gerard (talk) 15:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

   You cannot be serious. 𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈 (talk) 15:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

   There, I didn't remember it was still around. XD 𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈 (talk) 16:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Keep

1. It's userspace. FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 15:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
2. Userspace doesn't need AfDing in most cases.Keter (talk) 16:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)