There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
- I meant to rollback you deleting more than half the feminism page including the TOC on accident, but misclicked. Shrug. Also, I was just rewording the Motte and Bailey part. "doctrine" what the hell, who uses that? It makes it sound like some UFO rant on Timecube or something.Keter (talk) 15:34, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Well, my deletion of most of the feminism article was a mistake too, I've only meant to properly source the opening quote. And regarding the wording at the Motte thing, you should know that Aneris (who wrote most of that section) is an unhinged Slimepitter. Just look at Aneris' sandbox pages, it's nothing but rants and buzzwords. Typhoon (talk) 16:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)