User talk:Owlman
|
Welcome to RationalWiki, Owlman!
Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing:
|
Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 18:47, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
I WILL MILDY DISCOMFORT YOU[edit]
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Somebody just wants to let you know you did something silly. |
When adding more than one news item to WIGO, always add vote-thingies in DESCENDING order.
Before:
102 101
After:
104 103 102 101
Otherwise
103 104 102 101
Editor: "hmm, lemme add this"
104 103 104 102 101
Editor: "dafuq? Why are votes screwed up?"
Why did you revert me?[edit]
Why did you revert many of my edits, even after I started a talk page discussion before even making them? Zionist Goy (talk) 22:52, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- I don't always have time for leaisure and RW is currently low on my list of activities. Regardless, I didn't revert many of this user's edits, I reverted 3; one on Stalin, one on BLM, and one on Whataboutery. This user only started a discussion on the BLM page and reverted two well sourced sections (BDS support by BLM and Israeli apologia on whataboutery).--Owlman (talk) (mail) 23:59, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
We need your help liberating the space station![edit]
Or something. What I meant to say is: You've been nominated to the RationalMedia Foundation election. Please accept or decline here; if you accept, you may wish to campaign.
~ <3 03:07, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Dis is Inspectör Cluseau, speeking on de phöne[edit]
You've been nominated to the RationalMedia Foundation election. Please accept or decline here; if you accept, you may wish to campaign.
All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 12:15, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
You Make Me Sad[edit]
I'm sorry to see you go. You're a good editor, and we really need more people like you here. All the best, RoninMacbeth (talk) 05:22, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
I see you are running for moderator[edit]
Just recently joined, and apparently I've run afoul of views that, if my talk page is an indication, mean I'm considered "insane" here and subject to this thingie called a "vandal bin." Before I reach a conclusion about the lay of the land here I thought I'd survey the positions of those who seem to have some..."cred." This isn't a biggie site, but a few friends had said it is worth a look-see. Not sure I agree, but willing to consider. I doubt my background (academic, retired) would be conducive after seeing what got me -- I guess it's called "vandalized binned" -- stopped from contributing. But I'm asking if any are willing to opine. I've never before been treated like a troll and taken aback. [A message says I can't post again for 19 minutes. I'll do that then and be back again in a week or so to see if there are people here who are reasonable, as opposed to those who silence and call "insane" those with whom they disagree.]--Tea Sagan (talk) 05:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- ...@Tea SaganI am trying to be reasonable. RoninMacbeth (talk) 05:36, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Tea Sagan Owlman was nominated for a position on the board of trustees, not mod. He declined due to lack of activity. Christopher (talk) 06:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- OK. Just trying to locate whoever is in charge of following my attempts to make reasonable contributions and weirdly getting called "insane" and put in this bin thing where I can only post every 30 minutes. Not sure how it works here, but surely, people aren't just wed to insistence on one point of view absent competing evidence? I got pulled into political stuff b/c I didn't realize how much straight political entries are here -- I sort of thought this was just an anti-woo site.--Tea Sagan (talk) 06:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Tea Sagan Owlman was nominated for a position on the board of trustees, not mod. He declined due to lack of activity. Christopher (talk) 06:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Long time no see[edit]
Are you still around? Nerd (talk) 03:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC)