There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Bra
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Bra | Result: Keep[edit]
Delete[edit]
Keep[edit]
- Well-sourced rebuttals of psuedoscience and folk science. Cømяade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 14:36, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- This is an article? Whatever Fuzzy said, then. RoninMacbeth (talk) 14:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Neither off-mission nor pointless. A surprisingly good article. Spud (talk) 16:08, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- It was once bad, but I improved it.—(((CheeseburgerFace)))
(talk • stalk) 19:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: missional with references. Bongolian (talk) 19:44, 10 September 2017 (UTC)