There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Champagne socialist
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Champagne socialist | Result: Kept[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Largely a pointless hit job on a strawman |₹Λ¥$€₦₦
I'm sorry, dear. I'm reading Pokemon horror stories for the internet. 20:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Concur. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 20:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Agree, Massive edit war invlolved Bubba41102 CUMON STEP IT UP 20:08, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- So? I'm pretty sure articles on many subjects have had "edit wars", both here and on Wikipedia. Should that be a reason for removal? Carpetsmoker (talk) 20:35, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- check the edit history, one is incredibly long and not spov, and one is incredibly short — Unsigned, by: Bubba41102 / talk / contribs 21:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- The page makes sense, some edits by some users don't. Carpetsmoker (talk) 20:34, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 20:38, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- But only on the condition we fix it into a discussion of the phenomenon and why it's bullshit to say the upper class can't socialist. Otherwise, delete--Miekal 20:59, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Exactly because it's used as a snarl word I think it merits an article. But the original version was pretty crap. ScepticWombat (talk) 21:53, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Something on the snarling usage, maybe some of the discussion Miekal mentions. PacWalker 22:00, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Fine and useful as-is, could do with development - David Gerard (talk) 16:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Goat[edit]
- Could be funnified (and moved accordingly). PacWalker 20:09, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- RW does have other snarl word pages so this could make sense in that context.--SpecialFFrog (talk) 20:20, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- For general informational purposes, the term was first used in 1906. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 20:51, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- I went ahead and put that in the article. Thank you. PacWalker 21:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)