RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Champagne socialist

Champagne socialist | Result: Kept

Champagne socialist (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. Largely a pointless hit job on a strawman |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ ^{I'm sorry, dear. I'm reading Pokemon horror stories for the internet.} 20:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
2. Concur. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 20:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
3. Agree, Massive edit war invlolved Bubba41102 ^{CUMON STEP IT UP} 20:08, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

   So? I'm pretty sure articles on many subjects have had "edit wars", both here and on Wikipedia. Should that be a reason for removal? Carpetsmoker (talk) 20:35, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

   check the edit history, one is incredibly long and not spov, and one is incredibly short ^{— Unsigned, by: Bubba41102 / talk / contribs} 21:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Keep

1. The page makes sense, some edits by some users don't. Carpetsmoker (talk) 20:34, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
2. FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 20:38, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
3. But only on the condition we fix it into a discussion of the phenomenon and why it's bullshit to say the upper class can't socialist. Otherwise, delete--Miekal 20:59, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
4. Exactly because it's used as a snarl word I think it merits an article. But the original version was pretty crap. ScepticWombat (talk) 21:53, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
5. Something on the snarling usage, maybe some of the discussion Miekal mentions. PacWalker 22:00, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
6. Fine and useful as-is, could do with development - David Gerard (talk) 16:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Goat

• Could be funnified (and moved accordingly). PacWalker 20:09, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
• RW does have other snarl word pages so this could make sense in that context.--SpecialFFrog (talk) 20:20, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
• For general informational purposes, the term was first used in 1906. ikanreed ^{You probably didn't deserve that} 20:51, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

  I went ahead and put that in the article. Thank you. PacWalker 21:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)