RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Livingwhole.org

Livingwhole.org | Result: Keep

Livingwhole.org (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. This domain has new management with all new content. It is not part of a no-vaccination movement. The new site accepts vaccines are a safe way to protect against certain diseases and illness Strongwind (talk) 19:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

   The domain Livingwhole.org is no longer owned by anti-vaxer Megan Renshaw and is now not an anti-vax organization. I'm not sure if she had an organization, really. Anyone can have a .org. But I believe she is still active in promoting anti-vax information using substack. Here is one of her latest articles. The new site does refute some of her claims, including her claim that newborns should not be given a Vitamin K shot. The new content explains why it's needed and links to CDC for more information. Strongwind (talk) 14:17, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

   The domain livingwhole.org is also nolonger woo or pseudoscience. The content relies on scientific studies and not testimonials and is in line with science and functional medicine accepted by major hospitals like Mayo Clinic and Cleveland Clinic.Strongwind (talk) 13:41, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

   @Strongwind Then edit the article to say that. Spud (talk) 14:40, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Keep

1. well even if it changed doesn't mean we are going to delete the article ←§ Edward the eight (talk) 19:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
2. Bongolian (talk) 03:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Goat

1. Depends on if this is still a relevant organization or not--April ^Chat? 04:54, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
2. Suggest someone reliable do a compare/contrast between 'new' and 'old' versions, so see if claims made above true. If it is I would lean towards delete, as the thing isn't much more than a semi-stub and perhaps also an orphan page. KarmaPolice (talk) 18:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)