There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Madagascar
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Madagascar | Result: Deleted[edit]
- Madagascar – (View log)
Delete[edit]
- RW is not an encyclopedia. ⅅℐᎯℳᎾℕDⅅℐЅC1 (talk) 21:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Unsourced and off mission. Christopher (talk) 21:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- There is nothing missional in the article,
and I can't think of anything that could make it missional.(see in Goat) This is not SlightlyInterestingWiki. Readymade (talk) 22:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC) - Nothing missional. —Kazitor, pending 23:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 20:36, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
Merge/redirect[edit]
Goat[edit]
Is there any notable woo related to Madagascar? If there is, it could be added to rescue the article. Spriggina (beszélgetés) (közreműködés) @ 23:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Other than some iffy migration theories? None that I'm aware of. Comrade GC (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Iffy migration theories can be missional. Are any being used to support some kind of agenda? Readymade (talk) 13:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- If anyone wrote a good few paragraphs on these iffy migration theories I'd change my vote, but currently nothing in the article is on-mission. Christopher (talk) 13:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Is the article 'too vanilla'? Anna Livia (talk) 13:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- ? Christopher (talk) 14:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- A reference to one of the sources of vanilla. 'Obscure facts known' are there to be used. Anna Livia (talk) 15:48, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'll go digging around and see if I can find them again. Comrade GC (talk) 17:36, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- After digging around I couldn't find any information to support the migration claims being iffy, my apologies for my mistake. Comrade GC (talk) 19:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'll go digging around and see if I can find them again. Comrade GC (talk) 17:36, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- A reference to one of the sources of vanilla. 'Obscure facts known' are there to be used. Anna Livia (talk) 15:48, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- ? Christopher (talk) 14:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Is the article 'too vanilla'? Anna Livia (talk) 13:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- If anyone wrote a good few paragraphs on these iffy migration theories I'd change my vote, but currently nothing in the article is on-mission. Christopher (talk) 13:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Iffy migration theories can be missional. Are any being used to support some kind of agenda? Readymade (talk) 13:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)