RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Noah Carl

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Noah Carl | Result: ?[edit]

Noah Carl (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete[edit]

  1. Carl has complained of character assassination and inaccurate or misleading statements about him in his article: https://medium.com/@NoahCarl/some-comments-on-the-rationalwiki-page-about-me-e889d98bb165 I therefore think the article should be deleted or if the latter not possible rewritten. Looking at his response on his blog, some of his claims are total BS, while others appear justified e.g. he clearly is a racialist pseudoscientist, eugenicist etcetc so his denial about this is BS, but it appears he may be telling the truth about the OpenPsych editorial, which was an error. He uploaded a paper but tagged himself as reviewing it and this mislead some people into thinking he reviews his own paper submissions at OpenPsych. On the other hand, Kirkegaard and Carl just review each other's racist/Islamophobic paper submissions, nonetheless there are some errors on article. Someone needs to go over his blog post in detail to see what they are exactly. I'd vote though for deletion. Aeschylus (talk) 21:05, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

  1. Why don't we just clean it up instead of sweeping delete? --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 21:10, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
  2. Yes, it would be best if someone could remove anything that is inaccurate. Bongolian (talk) 21:14, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
  3. Per Bongolian and Mario. RoninMacbeth (talk) 21:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
  4. 'tis fine. — Dysk (contribs) 22:34, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
  5. Who the hell is this Aeschylus guy? Why is he completely freaking out like a little girl? 82.9.95.115 (talk) 12:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
    Ah yes, the "who even is this?" argument from a BoN with exactly one edit. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 16:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Merge/redirect[edit]

Goat[edit]