RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Non-binary gender
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Non-binary gender | Result: Deleted[edit]
Keep[edit]
Delete[edit]
- I've got no objection to an article on this subject. What I can't stand is copypasting from other wikis. The red links and the broken templates for "Quotation", "Urdu language" and "Citation error" clearly indicate that this was carelessly copied from another wiki. Non-binary gender on Wikipedia redirects to Genderqueer, which is quite different from this page. I'm guessing this is a copy of an old Wikipedia Non-binary gender article before it was changed into a redirect. Spud (talk) 04:23, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- It contains text from both wp:Third gender and wp:Genderqueer.--ZooGuard (talk) 12:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
KILL KILL KILL32℉uzzy; 0℃atPotato (talk/stalk) 06:03, 6 January 2015 (UTC)- KILL KILL KILL, but just the parts that are redlinks, that are templates that we don't have, and that are blatant copies. 32℉uzzy; 0℃atPotato (talk/stalk) 19:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- and rewrite from scratch Bicyclewheel
18:43, 6 January 2015 (UTC) - Delete for reasons stated above. In addition, we have Gender binary already, which seems to cover the same subject already? Carpetsmoker (talk) 12:05, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Well, fuck. I didn't know we couldn't copy-paste from Wikipedia. Mea culpa on that one guys, I'll go delete it, I'll have to rewrite it at some point. It was a clumsily stitched together Frankenstein of an article anyway, I'll write a better version in the future. My bad. Asarelah (talk) 16:45, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Goat[edit]
Wow. Nominated for deletion within 12 hours of being created. Nice. The article is actually stitched together from a few resources pretty well. They're CC by SA, but not attributed. It's great that nobody bothered to even let the principle author know that his or her contribution is going to be deleted for reasons that are entirely correctable. Good work. Nutty Roux (talk) 19:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)