There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Obscenity
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Obscenity | Result: Deleted[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Landmartian permastub, barely missional, not useful or referenced David Gerard (talk) 21:09, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Begone! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 21:38, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- This tends to be a criticism to free speech that social conservatives tend to lob quite often. It is definitely a slippery slope when you are arguing with them about porn and sex (i.e. sodomy). I suggest we expand this and mention the fallacious reasoning associated with it instead of deleting it.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 03:39, 26 March 2016 (UTC) 03:39, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Obscenity is usually by conservatives to attack sex-ed, pornography and sexual minorities and is part of the mission to combat authoritarianism. The page however needs to be expanded grealty Tuxer (talk) 03:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Merge/redirect[edit]
- Might be useful in pornography. Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 21:46, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Not worthy of its own article, not much of use left in there. Queexchthonic murmurings 11:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- What 142․124․55․236 said.ClickerClock (talk) 03:55, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Goat[edit]
- Seems relevant to our general anti-conservativeness. Maybe merge into Conservative correctness? 142.124.55.236 (talk) 21:14, 22 March 42016 AQD (UTC)
- The anti-conservativeness, though, isn't our mission. Don't get confused here. Anti-conservative things come from the fact that there are a lot of anti-science and/or authoritarian ideals in mainstream American conservatism. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 20:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)