RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Obscenity

Obscenity | Result: Deleted

Obscenity (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. Landmartian permastub, barely missional, not useful or referenced David Gerard (talk) 21:09, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
2. Begone! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 21:38, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Keep

1. This tends to be a criticism to free speech that social conservatives tend to lob quite often. It is definitely a slippery slope when you are arguing with them about porn and sex (i.e. sodomy). I suggest we expand this and mention the fallacious reasoning associated with it instead of deleting it.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 03:39, 26 March 2016 (UTC) 03:39, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
2. Obscenity is usually by conservatives to attack sex-ed, pornography and sexual minorities and is part of the mission to combat authoritarianism. The page however needs to be expanded grealty Tuxer (talk) 03:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Merge/redirect

1. Might be useful in pornography. Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 21:46, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
2. Not worthy of its own article, not much of use left in there. Queex_{chthonic murmurings} 11:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
3. What 142․124․55․236 said.ClickerClock (talk) 03:55, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Goat

• Seems relevant to our general anti-conservativeness. Maybe merge into Conservative correctness? 142.124.55.236 (talk) 21:14, 22 March 42016 AQD (UTC)
  • The anti-conservativeness, though, isn't our mission. Don't get confused here. Anti-conservative things come from the fact that there are a lot of anti-science and/or authoritarian ideals in mainstream American conservatism. ikanreed ^{You probably didn't deserve that} 20:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)