There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Social Credit
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Social Credit | Result: not ded[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Sourceless article that does little to debunk a supposedly crank theory, and instead focuses on Canadian politics. αδελφός ΓυζζγςατΡοτατο (talk/stalk) 19:40, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- Not convinced this should be deleted. Its relevance is that the Canadian party was actually a force for quite a while - David Gerard (talk) 12:28, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- Seems like the article needs work, rather than it being of dubious missionality. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 12:48, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep the article, and improve. Diacelium (talk) 14:24, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- It needs some work and at least a few proper references, but is worth keeping. --Cosmikdebris (talk) 02:18, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- Work on it and keep.-💠💿☝️ (talk) 04:20, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- Could use work, but is neither completely irrelevant or stubby. We do have other stuff on Canadian politics too, so... ScepticWombat (talk) 17:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)