There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Stupidity
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Stupidity | Result: Dead and stupid[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Not really an article about anything & certainly not analysing & refuting anything; just a few random quotes & other scraps of trivia thrown together. Weaseloid
Methinks it is a Weasel 07:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Nope. Cømяade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 07:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Nuke from orbit Blacke (talk) 07:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- It's more like an overgrown fork page than an actual article, but if you trimmed it back, would it still be worth having? Bicyclewheel
09:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'd argue we could keep it around as a Fun article. But keeping it as it is now, as much as I like the quotes in it, seems not great. The only downside is that we now have to clean up internal links to this page from a zillion articles. Still seems worth it, though. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 12:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Kill it with fire. --Castaigne (talk) 23:02, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- Deleting this article would be stupid.--Arisboch ☞✍☜☞✉☜ ∈)☼(∋ 16:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Why? How does it serve any of the site missions? Wèàšèìòìď
Methinks it is a Weasel 16:54, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Why? How does it serve any of the site missions? Wèàšèìòìď