RationalWiki talk:Article rating

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archives for this talk page: , (new)

Just Plain Ignorant Articles[edit]

RationalWiki obviously needs this rating category. Some articles in the other sections belong in this one. — Unsigned, by: Starchild / talk / contribs

HIGH / MID / LOW ratings[edit]

Can we add an explanation for these ratings to this page? oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 18:11, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Done, I think. CorruptUser (talk) 05:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


Have different types of brain - birdbrain, 'amoeba brain', 'brainwarped' etc. Anna Livia (talk) 16:02, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

A modest proposal[edit]

I suggest that for bronze articles we should require that there are no "naked URL" links (in other words, all citations are within <ref></ref> tags and are properly written citations. --Goatspeed. Fossil evidence of my evolutionCircularREmail2.gifasoningMy experiments 22:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

That sounds wise. Twodots Annoy me Look, ma! 22:32, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
That's perfectly reasonable. I'd prefer that it would be a strong suggestion rather than a requirement, though. That kind of thing is usually pretty easy to clean up. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 22:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Shouldn't it be a requirement if it's easy and improves the article's appearance? Twodots Annoy me Look, ma! 22:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── I know this is stale, but I agree with the proposal per all of the above. --Andrew5 (talk) 16:26, 1 January 2022 (UTC)


I am proposing, for cover stories, that RW:DEMOTE be allowed to be used as well. --Andrew5 (talk) 16:35, 18 December 2021 (UTC)