Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon internet.svg

This Internet related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.


Archives for this talk page: , (new)

redo links[edit]

See here. The WIGO page is probably a mess as well. Some bot person could do this maybe?? sterilesporadic heavy hitter 11:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Page yes. DGAF about the WIGO. ТyBored 11:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Maybe someone should just teach him how to use mod_rewrite, then the links can stay as they are? (talk) 11:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
I checked a couple of links from WIGO and they seem to work ok. That said, given that ASoK is essentially dead, it's really not worth the effort of updating it if they do break. --PsyGremlinPrata! 11:16, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
CP has been dead for years and yet some people are still obsessed with it. sterilesporadic heavy hitter 11:36, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
God will smite you for that! --PsyGremlinSnakk! 11:39, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
what sterile said. Fucking kill it already. ТyBored 11:54, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Phil wakes up[edit]

I see phil's woken up on WP again. Not checked, can't be arsed to look at his silly site, but have "contributions" to ask dropped to trigger even his boredom threshold? Scream!! (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

500 edits in the last 30 days or so at ASK, nobody but Phillip/spambots in over a week. ТyBother me 13:46, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Awc finally let it go, Hamster, Aspie and I haven't been there for a bit, Colonel S. is a transient, haven't seen Bradley in ages. sterilesporadic heavy hitter 15:26, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Wow. Philip can't get suckers to bother with him on his own website anymore so he goes and stirs the same old shit at WP. Awc tentatively entered the discussion, but I gather backed away slowly when he saw that Philip was up to his typical pattern of fisking and lies. Holy holy shitsnacks - walls of text so dense and filled with bullshit like explain everything anyone woud ever need to know about Philip to avoid him like the plague. There's no reason to bother with someone like this when it takes far long to refute his nonsense, and even then he only doubles down more nastily, and refuses to admit he's ever wrong about creationism.

12:50, 22 October 2012 (diff | hist) . . (+26,462)‎ . . User talk:Philip J. Rayment/Discussion with BRPierce ‎ (→‎Part 2: The onus is on you to support your claims, not on me to refute them; What "god" are you talking about if you don't need the Bible as a source of information?) : 14:15, 31 October 2012 (diff | hist) . . (+38,989)‎ User talk:Philip J. Rayment/Discussion with BRPierce ‎ (→‎Part 3: Still not explaining the basis of your faith.)

I pity this fool BRPierce for jumping down the rabbit hole. He at least had the good sense to disengage. 40k walls of text filled with fisking! Madness! Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 19:31, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

At least the quoted text isn't green. Redchuck.gif ГенгисYou have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you.Moderator 19:57, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
File:ASK Screen Shot 2013-03-29 at 7.59.18 PM.png
3/19/13: 119k wall of text = lonesome Phil

aSK is totally dead, yes?[edit]

I'm getting a "403", and I assume that's it, it's done. Should we change this article to past tense? — Unsigned, by: TheLateGatsby / talk / contribs 19:20, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

No, that's not what 403 means. You'll see a 404 when it's gone for good. He probably didn't pay his bill. He's so prideful that he managed to alienate everyone at 4 wikis. I seriously doubt that he's capable of admitting defeat and shutting aSK down when it couldn't cost more than $10 a month to keep it going. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 19:39, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
I believe you mean 10 dollarydoos. --Edgerunner76Your views are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter 13:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
It's easy to be coy about it coming from God's Own Christian Nation, but their dollar is doing pretty well for them being stubborn simpletons in a horrible place. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 13:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Okay, then. Then so long as it's "403", we have to assume it will come back? --TheLateGatsby (The end of the dock ) 19:52, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Ya. It's still there, just behind a wall. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 00:33, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
TEAR DOWN THAT WALL, ROUX. TEAR IT DOWN. (He's back....) Sterilesig.svgtalk 11:33, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
If I could take credit for anything I'd wish it to be that CMI's name is made more prominent on aSK in order to show what kind of piffle a zealot perfectly in line with company dogma spouts. aSK is a boon to anti-creationism. It's a real shame it doesn't come up very high on Google searches for any relevant topic. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 13:33, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Of Phillip's legendary pride, I still dream of getting him an audience with some major christian figureheads. We could unify the church if the leaders of denominations would listen to Phillip tell them how they're all wrong. Occasionaluse (talk) 14:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

I just hope that PJR keeps it going until Aug 5, 2013... --larron (talk) 15:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

The response you'll receive:
Are you an evolutionist? If so, are you willing to have a debate centered around the 15 questions for evolutionists (see: )

via a recorded oral debate which would be distributed to tens of thousands of people.

If you are confident in your evolutionary beliefs, please make the necessary arrangements via this free chat room:,89538844 You can make the necessary arrangements with the chat room moderators Shockofgod or VivaYehshua. Alternatively, you can email Shockofgod via his YouTube email at

If you want to know more about the debate, any and all questions should be directed to Shockofgod or VivaYehshua

There will be no future communication with you via this blog until you accept this debate offer and carry through with the debate.

Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 16:32, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

back to the living[edit]

Main Page Here.Civic CatTalk to Civic Cat 17:16, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Living how? No activity in two days, no mainspace edits in a week (although admittedly it's a new article). SophieWilderModerator 20:19, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
It was down for a little bit a while ago, but largely considered dormant but operational. Unless you call dealing with spammers and a largely one-person wiki operation a vibrant wiki community. Sterilesig.svgtalk 20:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
17 recent changes this month. Not vibrant, but not dead. Looks like Bart Simpson's made PJR the new Moe. Btw, what's with the strike out of Ace's name?Civic CatTalk to Civic Cat 22:31, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Philip is such a control freak that he can't handle just reverting things he doesn't like — he's also got to strike anything reflective of their content from the logs. It looks like some asshole impersonating that asshole vandalized that other asshole's site. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 00:25, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Phil always struck out/oversighted anything obscene, whether language or images. Not really new behaviour. --Kels (talk) 22:15, 15 August 2013 (UTC)


One entry in last 30 days. When's the wake? Scream!! (talk) 22:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

thats not DEAD, just a touch slow ;-) Hamster (talk) 17:10, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
He hasn't "refuted" your bogus alarmist nonsense or restored the pages AWC edited to their pristine state of Raymentness. Maybe he lost interest. Nutty Roux (talk) 17:42, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
In fact, he hasn't blown any of your lazy fallacies out of the water since mid October. It's at least a nice respite for all of us who can't avert our gazes from a train wreck that's been happening for more than 5 years. Nutty Roux (talk) 17:47, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
ASK is the world's slowest trainwreck. |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ Red rose 02.svg I'm the coolest driver's high 18:03, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
I rather hope none of you go over there and rekindle the fire. Sterile (talk) 18:09, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
AWC edited ASoK ! it was excusable. Maybe a banned editor created a new account, who can say for sure, but banned anyway. The tumbleweeds need quiet ! Hamster (talk) 17:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

ASK is officially dead.[edit]

I just tried to visit them via an old link. That was busted. There have been zeros edits over there in over thirty days (including zero bots active). And Philip's last edit was last July Fare thee well ASK, and good riddance. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 20:18, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Who knew that authoritarianism and wikis go badly together. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 20:22, 15 July 2019 (UTC)