Talk:Above Top Secret

	This conspiracy theories related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Archives for this talk page:

<1>

, (new)

Probably going to be zapped on Wikipedia

wp:Above Top Secret has been marked for prospective deletion, and frankly it deserves it. But is there anything from that article we could use? - David Gerard (talk) 15:04, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Some of the links can be cannibalized (the stats link for example), and I didn't know about the spat with LKJ (although I'm not surprised). Most of the text is not reusable without heavy editing, which means that it would be easier to write our own text on the same issues, if they are considered worth covering.--ZooGuard (talk) 16:49, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

At the top of the Wikipedia article at the moment:

please note:above top secret has been infiltrated by intelligence agency's from around the globe and is censored on sensitive subjects. and can no longer be treated as a site of truth.

• SNERK* --Pere Ubu (talk) 22:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Technical question

For those of us not familiar with such technicalities what does 'GFX-laced' mean? 82.44.143.26 (talk) 13:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

We've been noticed!

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1163927/pg1 Herr FuzzyKatzenPotato (talk/stalk) 19:01, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Carpeting

Perhaps the two uses of 'carpet' in the same paragraph could be cross-linked in a punning manner? 109.148.219.91 (talk) 11:42, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Hold the front page

Their site has 'Trump is Done' in the top batch of entries. Anna Livia (talk) 16:57, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Many of the nuts have soured on Trump now. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 22:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC)