Information icon.svg Nominations and campaigning for the RationalWiki 2020 Moderator Election are completed. Voting is live now, until 20:00 UTC, 1 December!

Talk:Jonathan Anomaly

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon race.svg

This Race related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Perhaps an American could explain this better[edit]

I don't understand this stuff, Koch brothers? Tobias (talk) 21:55, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Pro section[edit]

I don't see what's wrong with the section that you removed, @D. Can you explain this edit? @Gigantes/@Cyclopean wants to know. Bongolian (talk) 18:06, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

It's very simple. The esteemed gentleman with many names has written a section attacking this article which the subject wrote. Now it's true that like most garbage from Quillette it's not exactly free from bias, if you look at the later part it does seem to play to the white genocide conspiracy crowd. However, the relevant section of our article doesn't mention this, and instead uses argument from a different fringe ideology to suggest that having children itself is the problematic view, when it isn't, it's the articles other implications which this section I removed did not even address, though perhaps it could be dealt with in the #Pseudoscience and extremist views section instead in a more appropriate way. — Dysk (contribs) 20:26, 29 June 2019 (UTC)