2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $9223.37Goal: $10000

Talk:Mossad

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

References[edit]

I have not gone through all the references on this page but I see that they include the conspiracy site Above Top Secret along with various youtube videos. I'm not entirely sure these are all valid sources.--Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 18:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Not sure about "Above Top Secret" cuz I didn't add that. But the Youtubes I use as references are of actual Fox News interviews and reporting back when the station had not become a total clown car. Brit Hume and Carl Cameron were/are professionals in a way that Sean Hannity and these newer freaks are, well, not.---Mona- (talk) 18:40, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Checking the Above Top Secret thing, it appears to be an ironic link to a nutty conspiracy theory.---Mona- (talk) 18:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Just curious[edit]

Is espionage against allies newsworthy? The article is OK, it seems, but it is rather trivial to mention that an espionage agency does its job. Sorte Slyngel (talk) 20:09, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

This article is shit[edit]

I don't know why this is in mainspace and not draft space, because it's more of a draft than anything else. Oxyaena Harass 09:26, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

its good how you criticise articles but give no indications of whats wrong with them AMassiveGay (talk) 09:32, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Have you read it? It contains only a listicle and no major depth of content. That alone should be enough to classify it as shit. Oxyaena Harass 09:33, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
its not great but there are plenty worse. what do you suggest? AMassiveGay (talk) 09:40, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Complete revamp, maybe not as fawning. Oh, and this time no listicles. Oxyaena Harass 18:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
I sometimes think that almost every article about Israel and Palestine is bad to be honest. Though this one is perhaps the worst I've seen. GeeJayK (talk) 19:37, 18 July 2021 (UTC)