There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Vagina steaming
Relative significance[edit]
RatWik vs VagSteam. RatWik barely wins. Fuzzy. Cat. Potato! (talk/stalk) 22:14, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Man, just think about all those steaming vaginas out there that could do with our help... Reverend Black Percy (talk) 22:17, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Note to self[edit]
http://www.health.harvard.edu/womens-health/what-is-vaginal-steaming
Another doctor Herr FuzzyKatzenPotato (talk/stalk) 00:02, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
on "toxins" scare quote[edit]
"You can't steam-off cancer." Heat-shock protein autophagy disproves you. Lysdexia (talk) 23:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- From toxins to cancer to experimental biology in 20 words. Impressive, and no. FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 23:49, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Basically, it's sorcery for your vagina[edit]
My favorite published article to date. Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 23:47, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Cover article?[edit]
This is at RationalWiki:Articles for demotion/Vagina steaming as a nominee for gold. Anything it's still waiting on? - David Gerard (talk) 06:47, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- It would need a writeup for the main page abstract for one. Plutocow (talk) 06:59, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- OK! So only procedural stuff then? I can do that. (I'd say Fuzzy should, but he's even less active than me.) - David Gerard (talk) 21:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Another argument against[edit]
There isn't a male version/equivalent. Anna Livia (talk) 13:25, 13 December 2021 (UTC)