Talk:Virus
Calling[edit]
Okay, I'm calling a vote. I think this article doesn't meet any of the four parts of the mission statement. Remembering that RW is not a general encyclopedia, I think we should 86 this article. The Heidelberg Kid (talk) 22:47, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Science that has direct supporting relevance to vaccines. sshole 23:32, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Eighty-six this[edit]
- I think this article doesn't meet any of the four parts of the mission statement. Remembering that RW is not a general encyclopedia, I think we should 86 this article. The Heidelberg Kid (talk) 22:47, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Keep and expand[edit]
- WẽãšẽĩõĩďMethinks it is a Weasel 22:51, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- --MtDPinko Scum 23:03, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Blue (pester) 23:23, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- d hominem 23:32, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- --Dumpling (talk) 23:32, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Sam Tally-ho! 23:51, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Тytalk 00:55, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Goat[edit]
Okay, so…[edit]
I've started expanding and improving this. However, I will very shortly be taking a WikiBreak, meaning I won't be able to finish it, so if anybody else could pick up where I left off, that would be great. Impurity is the secret Unite with thy oracle 05:39, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Virus disbelievers[edit]
Having encountered one I presume it is 'more energy than it is worth' trying to convince them of the error of their ways.
However, this person said that with the post-WWII polio vaccine there was something 'wrong' with the polio vaccine ('it wasn't stirred enough'); and also that it is significant that the coronavirus arose where the 5G network was being developed in China.
Comments anyone? Anna Livia (talk) 17:12, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- We do have an article on germ theory denialism which may have some useful tidbits, I guess. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 17:16, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- It was more about the statements in the second paragraph.
- The point is in knowing those who can be persuaded of the error of their ways in such cases and those who will not. Anna Livia (talk) 17:25, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Most conspiracy theorists "want to believe", so no, they usually cannot be persuaded. Soundwave106 (talk) 18:19, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- We all want to believe 'various things' - including 'my pet (mad)/harmless theory.' Anna Livia (talk) 18:41, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Most conspiracy theorists "want to believe", so no, they usually cannot be persuaded. Soundwave106 (talk) 18:19, 3 March 2020 (UTC)