User:Fox/cocknockerSPAGWE

R   E   T   I   R   E   D
This user has requested that their pages be archived and left untouched.
This is due to a private decision to leave RationalWiki and never come back.
Please honor their request. (Inquiries here)

This is an archive page, last updated 2 December 2011. Please do not make edits to this page.

Heya Fox

Happy to see you are still around the innertubes. Hope real life is treating you well. ĴάΛäšςǍ₰ the most colourful sig on RationalWiki! 15:19, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi. Mustn't grumble =) Fox 00:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Stupid video. Wisest wisest Hoover! 22:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC) On further consideration I retract this statement. Wisest wisest Hoover! 18:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Feel free to watch it then hehe. Fox 20:35, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

I have watched it. I realised I was wrong after actually looking this stuff up. Wisest wisest Hoover! 21:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Stupid comment. So feel free to fuck off and not watch it =) Fox 22:10, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Stupid video - not due to subject matter though. Ace^McWicked 22:12, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Stupendous video. I have't laughed so much in ... hours? Генгис^{Our ignorance is God; what we know is science.} 22:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

It raises a chuckle for me. Fox 00:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

While my experience is that homeschooling is more in the Schlafly fundamentalist vein than a necessary escape from Big Brother, you have to admit that the lyrics are very clever. Either way, I hope things are going well, Fox. Corry 23:44, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

All things considered, very well, thanks. Fox 00:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey Fox! ħuman 00:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Lo! Fox 00:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

The middle part has a point, and it's a funny video. Out of all the homeschooled people I know, it only didn't work for one. Broccoli 00:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

It is scary ole times for home skollars =/ Fox 00:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

What? Fox is around again? Joyous news, even if it means Ragnarok is a bit closer. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי ^{שְׁלֹום!}

Good to see you back, too, old friend. =) Fox 10:02, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Can

Wow - Can! Stupendous! Tago Mago was always my favourite background music whilst taking the brown acid. Bob Soles 18:37, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Can just flick all my switches. I have all their stuff, and while the pre-70 material is still high on my list, everything they did with Damo is just frikkin' awesome. Mushroom and Oh Yeah from "Tago Mago" especially, but Mother Sky is my favourite. I have been known to (cough) accidentally take a glass or two of plonk with my pain meds on a Saturday night and just retire to the rocking chair in the kitchen sans headphones and Can. Perfect remedy for anything that ails you. Best thing about being a die-hard progger? Listening to people half your age proclaiming the latest avant garde sound to be years ahead of its time (eg Mogwai, who I also adore) and smiling to yourself because you know that Can, or Amon Düül, or some other now-obscure West German band already did it 40 years ago hehe. Fox 19:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Turds! Double turds!!

I've had that damn homeskollar song stuck in my head all day. Seriously. Corry 23:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Lionel Bart was certainly a gifted composer when it came to writing catchy choons hehe. Fox 09:20, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey there...

Um, what's up with the blanking pages today? Tetronian ^{you're clueless} 15:58, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

If its OK to fuck kiddies, then what's with the critical articles? Fox 16:01, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean by that. Are you referring to this? I can understand being angry over that essay, but that has nothing to do with the other articles. Tetronian ^{you're clueless} 16:03, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

User rights

Fox: I've temporarily De-sysopped & vandal binned you. Stop edit warring to make a point. Use the talk page. _& marmite^chat 16:05, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

ooh Im scared. A classic example of how the mob decides that fucking children is a right far more important than anybody elses. Congratz, kiddy fiddlers. You win. 86.171.62.230 16:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

No-one's trying to scare you. Don't be so confrontational. _& marmite^chat 16:11, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

You mean, "everybody" might have sysop rights? EXCEPT those who disagree, of course. lol.Hi TK. 86.171.62.230 16:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey Fox. I have a question. Can you find any statement anyone on this site has made which defends child molestation? Please find me the appropriate quote. I haven't seen one. DickTurpis 16:16, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

EC) Disagreeing doesn't mean blanking several articles totally unrelated to the matter at hand. _& marmite^chat 16:17, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

I believe Fox is banned, which makes your statement pretty hypocritical. Freedom of speech, and all that. 86.171.62.230 16:19, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Not banned, merely vandal binned. Because of intentionally blanking pages. Reasonable. Stop being a troll and you'll prolly get the rights back. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 16:22, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

EC) Freedom of speech is one thing: Fox stopped "speaking" and started vandalising. _& marmite^chat 16:25, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

There. I've de-vandal-binned you. If you can stop blanking pages you should be a sysop again soon. Now. Can you provide a quote like I asked above? I really think you're misinterpreting everything. DickTurpis 16:28, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Talk page =/= yours.

"A user's talk page, like any other talk page on the site, is public and does not belong to the user. No deletion of talk page material is permitted, although archiving may be done periodically." RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 16:36, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Alright, fox, seriously.

First off, what on earth is going on? I come on to the wiki and you are practically bombing away with article stubification, and saying something about RW condoning pedophillia. I would like to understand, from your point of view, why you think that, and I would also like to nicely ask that you refrain from, for all extents and purposes, deleting articles.

In addition, the talk page does belong to the community, see Here. Please take the time to respond. ĴάΛäšςǍ₰ A sig not even he can predict! 16:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Say

When you grow up past, oh, four years old, come back and let us know. --Kels 16:48, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Blow it out your ass, kiddy fucker. Fox 16:49, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

That was a short retirement, Fox. _& marmite^chat 16:53, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Can we please refrain from ad homs? Please? Javasca₧ edits from 36.188.177.164 16:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Acting out because people don't immediately give you your way strikes me as childish behaviour, so more an accurate description than an ad hom. --Kels 16:51, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

blah blah blah look at me! I'ma lezzer something or other and what i sy is MOAR IMPOTENT than you. STFU. Noone really likes you, and we all think your art is shit. (worse than shit - infantile.) Get over it, loser. Fox 16:54, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Fox, step away from the computer and come back in a little while. And please, please, please try to calm down. Take a deep breath or something. Tetronian ^{you're clueless} 16:56, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

I think that rather than "grow up", "lay off the booze", wouldn't be a bad idea, Fox.

Either way, he's really doing a bang-up job at stating his case, don't you think? --Kels 16:59, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

A tad excitable, but otherwise putting his point very well^[not]. _& marmite^chat 17:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Booze indeed. The bulk of activity around this issue seems to have been happening with the sun above the yard, as seen in Greenwich on a Saturday afternoon. Hope the dry heaves don't hit you too badly tomorrow. Sprocket J Cogswell 17:11, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

This conversation is about to go badly downhill, inevitably ending in comparisons to Hitler, and hurt feelings all around. Stop now. Step away from the keyboard. Go pet a jerboa, or milk a goat.

The Goonie Punk ^{Can't sleep, clowns will eat me!} 18:41, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

An hour and a half after the end of the discussion? ;-) That should get the "Locking the stable door" award.--Bob^{Not Jim} 18:53, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Nah, that was more in order to prevent those same people from coming back later and dredging up the argument again. AnarchoGoon ^{Swatting Assflys is how I earn my living} 19:05, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Quite honestly a silly template wouldn't affect me if I wanted to continue the discussion but, as it was 90 minutes dead, I don't think it was at all necessary. _& marmite^chat 19:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Suit yourselves. I'm just bored and hungover. The Spikey Punk ^{I'm punking my punk!} 19:10, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Are you retired, or not?

'Cause I was under the impression "retired" meant we wouldn't have to put up with your trollery for at least a day or so. Foxy, baby, how can we miss you if you don't leave, sweetheart? RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 19:57, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Are you retired, or not?

'Cause I was under the impression "retired" meant we wouldn't have to put up with your trollery for at least a day or so. Foxy, baby, how can we miss you if you don't leave, sweetheart? RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 19:57, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Amusing

Innit? _& marmite^chat 20:03, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

The wages of drunkness!