User talk:Π/ArchiveLiquid
- [Edit↑]
- [Fossil record↑]
Contents
First page |
Previous page |
Next page |
Last page |
No. 51
just saying RationalWiki_talk:Active_users#I_have_dropped_of_the_user_list_entirely - though together with pimobile you are #46 or #47....
Nice to know I haven't vanished entirely.
Not only have you vanished, but you are notably absent! What's up?
Larron as I live and breath. I must get back to reading the Answers Research Journal, all these years filling my head with actual knowledge will only rot it.
This isn't working again
Pi. Do you still exist? This isn't working. Also, instructions would be nice.
cf.,
RationalWiki:Saloon_bar#FUCKING_FIX_WIGOBOT.2C_WILL_YOU
(Apparently the concept of a talk page is too complicated...)
Sorry I was running an old version I had on my laptop whilst I was away on holidays.
It's such a lovely gathering of Π's and Π people
Like to give a shout-out to Lemon Pretend over there.
que?
Not my page this time. The 90/10 talk page.
I would like you to archive Conservapedia talk:90/10 Rule using Pibot, please.
Russell Crowe
You New Zealanders are far too modest. You should take full credit for producing the fine actor and musician Russell Crowe.
For some reason, I read this and thought of you.....
I want YOU
To join the RationalWiki moderators!
Thanks for your support. Problem is I don't even know what the position is expected to do after being in it for 6 months.
Vote Ace - I promise to instigate more defined rules as well as a mod removal policy.
Also, I nominated you for the board/foundation/whatever. Go here
WIGOBot
I thought I fixed that once. Oh well, I have a new computer so as soon as I sent up Perl on it, I will copy my code for WIGObot accross and fix it (if I remember at that point).
Just fixed it. I was going to rewrite the code soon as the current code is based on some hacks that were used for the old capturebot. One thing I was going to do was rewrite the regex so that poll is closed even if the numbering is fucked up. Also get the bot to determine if new month has been started so I don't have to check all the time.
The Serious Police...
Those were the days. Didn't even like the compromise?
Hi, this is the Serious Police stopping by to see if you're being serious enough.
Hm. Looks like we'll have to sanction you at this rate.
Hyperbole
All I said was that women should not cheat on their husbands. It doesn't mean I think they should be chaperoned. You are very black & white.
Sorry, I no idea what you are talking about. Can you point me to the discussion we were having?
Why would adultery be wrong? Assuming you are open and honest about it. But I've never once seen a woman "get away" with something a man can't get away with. heavens child... try living with the grownups.
Stop replying to my conversations! I was not even talking to you! Goddamn! Mind your own fucking business!
What about emotional manipulation? When a man does it, it can be called spousal abuse, but when a man complains about women doing it, he is generally a misogynist.
I think that is slowly changing, but you are right. I think women do know how to, and do not hesitate to use emotional manipulation to get what they want. Especially passive aggressive behaviors, "selling" of their sexual favors in the couple's bedroom in exchange for whatever they desire at the point, and yes, crying. I hate crying women. not women who cry when things are hard, or sad, or loney... but women who use tears to get men's pity. And i think you are also right that there is a larger stigma to saying "i'm being abused by my wife", then "i'm being abused by my husband". on the other hand, were emotional manipulation is concerned (and IF there are no kids) I hold both adults responsible. ie., if they suck as a partner, leave. and leave now, before there ARE kids. (if there are kids, well, that's a different battle i cannot speak to).
First page |
Previous page |
Next page |
Last page |