User talk:67.135.49.116

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, anonymous editor! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun! While you are free to continue to edit as, and be identified by, your IP address, you might prefer to create an account (they're free!), or log in if you already have one. If you create an account, your IP address will not be displayed and you will face fewer editing restrictions.

Or not... ħuman 00:05, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

I *did* give you evidence...

But here it is again, just in case you missed it...

Bunchanumbers: see our articles on MexMax and Samwell. There clearly are parodists (or agents provocateur, rather) amongst the CP camp, and, what's more, they are mostly undetectable. Sorry. ↳↑⇨↕▽← 17:47, 28 June 2008 (EDT)

Enough? More? _{<blink>↳</blink> ↑ <blink>⇨</blink> ↕ ▽ ←} 15:06, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

Poe Law

Hi. I left a couple of questions for you on the Poe's law page. Could you have a shot at them? Thanks.--Bob^{bing up} 15:09, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

In case it's not clear what they are I've copied them below. Thanks again.--Bob^{bing up} 15:48, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

The questions

Actually I've got a question for our unsigned editor. Could you tell me what is the the difference between the parody and the non-parody sites? It may be easier for you because you are "In the loop" so-to-speak. I know you say they "try too hard", but could you expand on this? Perhaps give a few concrete examples of both "legitimate fundamentalist" and and "parody fundamentalist". I don't mean the sites but actual statements. I mean this question in all seriousness and I'm interested in the answer.--Bob^{bing up} 18:09, 28 June 2008 (EDT)

Ps. Could you also tell us if this one is a parody, 'cause we don't know. Thanks.--Bob^{bing up} 08:07, 29 June 2008 (EDT)

Our unsigned editor...

...is likely Jinxmchue. --Helena Bonham Carter 15:58, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

Really? Wow! Hi, Jinxmyshoe! How's that "almost-a-sysop" thing working out for you? _{<blink>↳</blink> ↑ <blink>⇨</blink> ↕ ▽ ←} 16:13, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

Might I refer interested parties to our community standards RationalWiki:Community Standards. --Bob^{bing up} 16:25, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

Technically speaking, our dear HBC was merely stating her personal opinion that the present IP is likely Jinxmchue. Which is not technically "volunteering personal information", at least not as long as we don't have any solid evidence to back up that opinion. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:28, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

I was merely drawing people's attention to the existence of the line. I did not say it had been crossed. I suspect however that we are walking it. One might also talk in general terms about the spirit and the letter of the law. --Bob^{bing up} 16:36, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

Indeed, sir, indeed. Such discussions are the heart and soul of jurisprudence, while walking that line is the heart and soul of practical law. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:38, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

Then I am sure that we are, as usual, in agreement.--Bob^{bing up} 16:52, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

Wow. Brilliant deduction, Sherlock. That must've burned up, what? At least 3 brain cells? Go back to acting. You're much better at it. 67.135.49.116 01:19, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

Indeed, it is Jinxmchue. No one else can be so big an asshole in so few words. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:23, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

Wow! We are crotchety today. ^{— Unsigned, by: 3.14159 / talk / contribs} 01:26, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

Denis Leary said it best: "I'm an asshole and I'm proud of it." 67.135.49.116 17:30, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

67.135.49.116, please cease and desist from your scandalous attitude towards my client, or we will initiate proceedings towards having you excommunicated and optionally drawn and quartered. Thank you. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 04:34, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

Once again

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, anonymous editor! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun! While you are free to continue to edit as, and be identified by, your IP address, you might prefer to create an account (they're free!), or log in if you already have one. If you create an account, your IP address will not be displayed and you will face fewer editing restrictions.

See the red link above? Why not join up, so we don't think of you as some random bunch of numbers, and instead address you by some hilarious concatenation of characters. Otherwise, you are just some (blank) on the internet making no sense (and I might point out, not answering our questions in response to yours). ħuman 01:28, 2 July 2008 (EDT)